RCD vs. FDIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RCD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS).
RCD and FDIS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RCD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. FDIS is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both RCD and FDIS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RCD or FDIS.
Performance
RCD vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCD achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's 18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RCD has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 7.43%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.
RCD
13.87%
1.38%
11.82%
27.73%
9.46%
7.43%
FDIS
18.99%
6.18%
16.86%
29.17%
16.10%
13.91%
Key characteristics
| RCD | FDIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.72 | 1.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.39 | 2.27 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.30 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.47 | 1.43 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.56 | 8.27 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.22% | 3.48% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.07% | 17.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.25% | -39.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.67% | -2.95% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCD vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between RCD and FDIS is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RCD vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RCD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RCD vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
RCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than FDIS's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.85% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.05% | 0.87% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.70% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% | 1.01% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
RCD vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCD drawdown since its inception was -69.25%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCD and FDIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RCD vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RCD) is 3.94%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that RCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.