PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RCAT vs. VRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RCAT and VRT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

RCAT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.40%
505.48%
RCAT
VRT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RCAT:

4.88

VRT:

-0.43

Sortino Ratio

RCAT:

3.83

VRT:

-0.17

Omega Ratio

RCAT:

1.45

VRT:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

RCAT:

6.65

VRT:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

RCAT:

22.98

VRT:

-1.38

Ulcer Index

RCAT:

28.79%

VRT:

22.02%

Daily Std Dev

RCAT:

135.58%

VRT:

71.13%

Max Drawdown

RCAT:

-99.76%

VRT:

-71.24%

Current Drawdown

RCAT:

-96.30%

VRT:

-61.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RCAT:

$528.45M

VRT:

$22.62B

EPS

RCAT:

-$0.51

VRT:

$1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

RCAT:

$10.62M

VRT:

$6.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RCAT:

$696.78K

VRT:

$2.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

RCAT:

-$15.90M

VRT:

$1.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCAT achieves a -51.98% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's -47.68% return.


RCAT

YTD

-51.98%

1M

14.47%

6M

86.97%

1Y

653.36%

5Y*

44.32%

10Y*

N/A

VRT

YTD

-47.68%

1M

-32.38%

6M

-43.49%

1Y

-26.28%

5Y*

49.97%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RCAT vs. VRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RCAT is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RCAT is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RCAT is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VRT is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VRT is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VRT is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VRT is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VRT is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VRT is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RCAT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 4.88, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
RCAT: 4.88
VRT: -0.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
RCAT: 3.83
VRT: -0.17
The chart of Omega ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
RCAT: 1.45
VRT: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 7.07, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
RCAT: 7.07
VRT: -0.49
The chart of Martin ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 22.98, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
RCAT: 22.98
VRT: -1.38

The current RCAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.88, which is higher than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCAT and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
4.88
-0.43
RCAT
VRT

Dividends

RCAT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

RCAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.


TTM20242023202220212020
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.21%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Drawdowns

RCAT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-56.52%
-61.28%
RCAT
VRT

Volatility

RCAT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a higher volatility of 34.38% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 28.38%. This indicates that RCAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
34.38%
28.38%
RCAT
VRT

Financials

RCAT vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Cat Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab