RCAT vs. VRT

In the year-to-date period, RCAT achieves a -59.61% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's -23.43% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RCAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCAT and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RCAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a higher volatility of 40.76% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 32.44%. This indicates that RCAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Cat Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.