RCAT vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

RCAT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RCAT having a 63.18% return and VRT slightly lower at 61.32%.

RCAT

• 1D: 6.50%
• 1M: -14.19%
• YTD: 63.18%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 109.72%
• 3Y*: 133.23%
• 5Y*: 24.85%
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 61.32%
• 6M: 63.20%
• 1Y: 340.35%
• 3Y*: 165.75%
• 5Y*: 65.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCAT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc.	63.18%	-38.29%	1,360.23%	-6.38%	-54.81%	-30.67%	172.73%	-38.89%	-68.09%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	61.32%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RCAT and VRT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RCAT : $1.55B VRT : $102.34B
EPS RCAT : -$0.71 VRT : $3.41
PS Ratio RCAT : 32.25 VRT : 13.89
PB Ratio RCAT : 6.29 VRT : 25.97
Total Revenue (TTM) RCAT : $40.73M VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) RCAT : $1.28M VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) RCAT : -$60.91M VRT : $2.05B

Return for Risk

RCAT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCAT

RCAT Risk / Return Rank: 67
RCAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RCAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
RCAT Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RCAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RCAT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 97
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCAT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCAT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	3.84	-3.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	3.85	-2.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.51	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	9.99	-8.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.70	28.96	-25.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCAT vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCAT and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCAT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	3.84	-3.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	1.08	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.98	-1.04

Drawdowns

RCAT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCAT	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.76%	-71.24%	-28.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.08%	-24.78%	-35.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.25%	-71.24%	-21.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.24%	-5.38%	-86.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.58%	-16.46%	-79.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.72%	8.55%	+19.17%

Volatility

RCAT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a higher volatility of 38.03% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 19.51%. This indicates that RCAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCAT	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.03%	19.51%	+18.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.72%	44.75%	+39.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	120.34%	62.78%	+57.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.21%	61.03%	+53.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	251.31%	54.57%	+196.74%

Dividends

RCAT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

RCAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials