PortfoliosLab logo
RCAT vs. ROM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RCAT and ROM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

RCAT vs. ROM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-89.16%
478.10%
RCAT
ROM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RCAT:

2.53

ROM:

-0.05

Sortino Ratio

RCAT:

3.03

ROM:

0.35

Omega Ratio

RCAT:

1.35

ROM:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

RCAT:

3.34

ROM:

-0.06

Martin Ratio

RCAT:

10.39

ROM:

-0.16

Ulcer Index

RCAT:

32.02%

ROM:

16.86%

Daily Std Dev

RCAT:

129.16%

ROM:

60.13%

Max Drawdown

RCAT:

-99.76%

ROM:

-83.36%

Current Drawdown

RCAT:

-96.89%

ROM:

-31.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCAT achieves a -59.61% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's -24.83% return.


RCAT

YTD

-59.61%

1M

-10.75%

6M

92.94%

1Y

255.48%

5Y*

31.19%

10Y*

N/A

ROM

YTD

-24.83%

1M

-8.36%

6M

-24.56%

1Y

-2.96%

5Y*

25.59%

10Y*

26.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RCAT vs. ROM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RCAT is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RCAT is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ROM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROM is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROM is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROM is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROM is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROM is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROM is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RCAT vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
RCAT: 2.53
ROM: -0.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
RCAT: 3.03
ROM: 0.35
The chart of Omega ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
RCAT: 1.35
ROM: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 3.34, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
RCAT: 3.34
ROM: -0.06
The chart of Martin ratio for RCAT, currently valued at 10.38, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
RCAT: 10.39
ROM: -0.16

The current RCAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the ROM Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCAT and ROM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.53
-0.05
RCAT
ROM

Dividends

RCAT vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison

RCAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.29%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%0.24%

Drawdowns

RCAT vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than ROM's maximum drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and ROM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-96.89%
-31.97%
RCAT
ROM

Volatility

RCAT vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a higher volatility of 40.76% compared to ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) at 37.17%. This indicates that RCAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
40.76%
37.17%
RCAT
ROM