RAYS.L vs. FILL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL).
RAYS.L and FILL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RAYS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. It was launched on Aug 2, 2021. FILL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both RAYS.L and FILL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RAYS.L or FILL.
Correlation
The correlation between RAYS.L and FILL is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RAYS.L vs. FILL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RAYS.L:
-0.77
FILL:
0.30
RAYS.L:
-0.99
FILL:
0.50
RAYS.L:
0.85
FILL:
1.06
RAYS.L:
-0.60
FILL:
0.29
RAYS.L:
-1.30
FILL:
0.63
RAYS.L:
30.54%
FILL:
7.93%
RAYS.L:
51.21%
FILL:
16.21%
RAYS.L:
-65.64%
FILL:
-65.98%
RAYS.L:
-63.88%
FILL:
-9.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAYS.L achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than FILL's 5.49% return.
RAYS.L
2.05%
-3.35%
-11.45%
-40.77%
N/A
N/A
FILL
5.49%
-1.34%
-2.59%
2.78%
11.24%
4.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RAYS.L vs. FILL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAYS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FILL's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RAYS.L vs. FILL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RAYS.L
FILL
RAYS.L vs. FILL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RAYS.L vs. FILL - Dividend Comparison
RAYS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAYS.L Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FILL iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | 4.13% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 3.97% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.10% | 2.75% | 3.41% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
RAYS.L vs. FILL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAYS.L drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FILL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS.L and FILL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RAYS.L vs. FILL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) at 5.21%. This indicates that RAYS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.