PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RAYC vs. GXC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RAYCGXC
YTD Return12.80%6.55%
1Y Return-9.88%-5.28%
3Y Return (Ann)-16.51%-15.58%
Sharpe Ratio-0.54-0.21
Daily Std Dev18.15%23.69%
Max Drawdown-57.65%-72.16%
Current Drawdown-48.58%-49.76%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between RAYC and GXC is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

RAYC vs. GXC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RAYC achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than GXC's 6.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%-48.00%-46.00%-44.00%-42.00%-40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-39.57%
-39.96%
RAYC
GXC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF

SPDR S&P China ETF

RAYC vs. GXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYC has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GXC's 0.59% expense ratio.


RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for RAYC: current value at 0.80% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.80%
Expense ratio chart for GXC: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RAYC vs. GXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAYC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RAYC, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.500.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00-0.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00-0.63
GXC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GXC, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GXC, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GXC, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.500.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GXC, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00-0.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GXC, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00-0.36

RAYC vs. GXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAYC Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the GXC Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of RAYC and GXC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.500.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.54
-0.21
RAYC
GXC

Dividends

RAYC vs. GXC - Dividend Comparison

RAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than GXC's 3.47% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
4.06%4.58%1.65%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
3.47%3.70%2.67%1.35%1.04%1.60%2.03%1.84%2.05%2.85%2.11%2.29%

Drawdowns

RAYC vs. GXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYC drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, smaller than the maximum GXC drawdown of -72.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYC and GXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-58.00%-56.00%-54.00%-52.00%-50.00%-48.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-48.58%
-49.76%
RAYC
GXC

Volatility

RAYC vs. GXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) is 5.85%, while SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that RAYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.85%
6.97%
RAYC
GXC