PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RAYC vs. EMXC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RAYCEMXC
YTD Return13.20%3.72%
1Y Return-7.91%16.37%
3Y Return (Ann)-16.04%-0.19%
Sharpe Ratio-0.471.30
Daily Std Dev18.22%12.85%
Max Drawdown-57.65%-42.80%
Current Drawdown-48.40%-4.32%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between RAYC and EMXC is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

RAYC vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RAYC achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than EMXC's 3.72% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-39.36%
7.72%
RAYC
EMXC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

RAYC vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYC has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for RAYC: current value at 0.80% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.80%
Expense ratio chart for EMXC: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RAYC vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAYC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RAYC, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.500.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00-0.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RAYC, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00-0.59
EMXC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EMXC, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EMXC, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EMXC, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EMXC, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.000.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EMXC, currently valued at 3.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.94

RAYC vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAYC Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of RAYC and EMXC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.000.001.002.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.47
1.30
RAYC
EMXC

Dividends

RAYC vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

RAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than EMXC's 1.76% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
4.04%4.58%1.65%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
1.76%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.62%0.99%

Drawdowns

RAYC vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYC drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYC and EMXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-48.40%
-4.32%
RAYC
EMXC

Volatility

RAYC vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 4.04%. This indicates that RAYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.68%
4.04%
RAYC
EMXC