PortfoliosLab logo
RAYC vs. ECNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RAYC and ECNS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RAYC vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RAYC:

0.20

ECNS:

0.30

Sortino Ratio

RAYC:

0.49

ECNS:

0.72

Omega Ratio

RAYC:

1.08

ECNS:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

RAYC:

0.11

ECNS:

0.19

Martin Ratio

RAYC:

0.31

ECNS:

0.75

Ulcer Index

RAYC:

19.57%

ECNS:

16.02%

Daily Std Dev

RAYC:

33.07%

ECNS:

36.51%

Max Drawdown

RAYC:

-57.65%

ECNS:

-63.43%

Current Drawdown

RAYC:

-45.40%

ECNS:

-48.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAYC achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than ECNS's 10.11% return.


RAYC

YTD

4.37%

1M

7.76%

6M

1.13%

1Y

6.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ECNS

YTD

10.11%

1M

6.52%

6M

11.96%

1Y

10.91%

5Y*

-0.68%

10Y*

-3.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RAYC vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYC has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ECNS's 0.59% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RAYC vs. ECNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAYC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RAYC is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RAYC is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RAYC is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RAYC is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RAYC is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RAYC is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ECNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ECNS is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ECNS is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ECNS is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ECNS is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ECNS is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ECNS is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RAYC vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RAYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the ECNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAYC and ECNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RAYC vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison

RAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than ECNS's 5.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
3.95%4.12%4.58%1.65%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
5.43%5.98%4.90%3.54%4.87%3.59%3.23%6.16%3.18%4.30%3.58%2.51%

Drawdowns

RAYC vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYC drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, smaller than the maximum ECNS drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYC and ECNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RAYC vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) is 4.48%, while iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that RAYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...