PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RATE vs. FLTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RATE and FLTR is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

Performance

RATE vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RATE) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
22.77%
18.04%
RATE
FLTR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RATE:

0.51

FLTR:

7.37

Sortino Ratio

RATE:

0.95

FLTR:

12.02

Omega Ratio

RATE:

1.10

FLTR:

3.89

Calmar Ratio

RATE:

0.44

FLTR:

9.97

Martin Ratio

RATE:

1.09

FLTR:

112.09

Ulcer Index

RATE:

11.34%

FLTR:

0.07%

Daily Std Dev

RATE:

24.20%

FLTR:

1.00%

Max Drawdown

RATE:

-28.48%

FLTR:

-17.84%

Current Drawdown

RATE:

-14.88%

FLTR:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RATE achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 7.16% return.


RATE

YTD

12.19%

1M

2.01%

6M

2.77%

1Y

11.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FLTR

YTD

7.16%

1M

0.56%

6M

3.08%

1Y

7.34%

5Y*

3.46%

10Y*

2.83%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RATE vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RATE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.


RATE
Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF
Expense ratio chart for RATE: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for FLTR: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RATE vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RATE) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RATE, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.517.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for RATE, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.9512.02
The chart of Omega ratio for RATE, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.103.89
The chart of Calmar ratio for RATE, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.449.97
The chart of Martin ratio for RATE, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.09112.09
RATE
FLTR

The current RATE Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 7.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RATE and FLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.51
7.37
RATE
FLTR

Dividends

RATE vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

RATE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.14%, more than FLTR's 5.99% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RATE
Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF
29.14%35.06%15.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLTR
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
5.99%6.08%2.30%0.63%1.49%3.05%2.67%1.69%1.16%0.71%0.66%0.65%

Drawdowns

RATE vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RATE drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RATE and FLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-14.88%
0
RATE
FLTR

Volatility

RATE vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RATE) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.16%. This indicates that RATE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.70%
0.16%
RATE
FLTR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab