PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RATE vs. FLTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RATEFLTR
YTD Return8.05%6.35%
1Y Return-9.90%7.59%
Sharpe Ratio-0.287.21
Sortino Ratio-0.2411.69
Omega Ratio0.973.71
Calmar Ratio-0.2510.25
Martin Ratio-0.52113.04
Ulcer Index13.63%0.07%
Daily Std Dev25.69%1.05%
Max Drawdown-28.48%-17.84%
Current Drawdown-18.02%-0.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between RATE and FLTR is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RATE vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RATE achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 6.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.54%
3.03%
RATE
FLTR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RATE vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RATE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.


RATE
Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF
Expense ratio chart for RATE: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for FLTR: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RATE vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RATE) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RATE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RATE, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RATE, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RATE, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RATE, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RATE, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.52
FLTR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLTR, currently valued at 7.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.007.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLTR, currently valued at 11.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0011.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLTR, currently valued at 3.71, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.71
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLTR, currently valued at 10.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0010.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLTR, currently valued at 113.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00113.04

RATE vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RATE Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 7.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RATE and FLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.28
7.21
RATE
FLTR

Dividends

RATE vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

RATE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.40%, more than FLTR's 6.11% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RATE
Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF
30.40%35.06%15.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLTR
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
6.11%6.08%2.30%0.63%1.49%3.05%2.67%1.69%1.16%0.71%0.66%0.65%

Drawdowns

RATE vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RATE drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RATE and FLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.02%
-0.04%
RATE
FLTR

Volatility

RATE vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RATE) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.27%. This indicates that RATE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.37%
0.27%
RATE
FLTR