R2SC.L vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
R2SC.L and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. R2SC.L is a passively managed fund by State Street Global Advisors Ltd that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 30, 2014. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both R2SC.L and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: R2SC.L or SMH.
Key characteristics
| R2SC.L | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.96% | 44.98% |
| 1Y Return | 37.90% | 62.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.73% | 20.67% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.91% | 33.80% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.80% | 28.95% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.09 | 1.99 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.71 | 2.49 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.86 | 2.77 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.01 | 7.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.29% | 9.00% |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.13% | 34.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.03% | -95.73% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -9.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between R2SC.L and SMH is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
R2SC.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, R2SC.L achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 44.98% return. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.80%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
R2SC.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
R2SC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
R2SC.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
R2SC.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
R2SC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.41% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
R2SC.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R2SC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R2SC.L and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
R2SC.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) is 6.44%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that R2SC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.