R2SC.L vs. EQQQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).
R2SC.L and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. R2SC.L is a passively managed fund by State Street Global Advisors Ltd that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 30, 2014. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both R2SC.L and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: R2SC.L or EQQQ.L.
Key characteristics
| R2SC.L | EQQQ.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.29% | 25.14% |
| 1Y Return | 33.29% | 31.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.81% | 11.58% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.94% | 21.26% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.82% | 20.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.90 | 1.91 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.49 | 2.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.53 | 2.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.30 | 7.47 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.29% | 4.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.06% | 15.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.03% | -33.75% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between R2SC.L and EQQQ.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
R2SC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, R2SC.L achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 25.14% return. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 10.82%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
R2SC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both R2SC.L and EQQQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
R2SC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
R2SC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
R2SC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% | 1.01% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
R2SC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R2SC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, roughly equal to the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R2SC.L and EQQQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
R2SC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.36%. This indicates that R2SC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.