QVMS vs. SPHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF (SPHQ).
QVMS and SPHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVMS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. SPHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 High Quality Rankings Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005. Both QVMS and SPHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QVMS or SPHQ.
Key characteristics
QVMS | SPHQ | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 17.51% | 27.59% |
1Y Return | 38.67% | 35.98% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 4.52% | 10.92% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.87 | 3.00 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.78 | 4.15 |
Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.55 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.14 | 5.82 |
Martin Ratio | 11.19 | 22.62 |
Ulcer Index | 3.47% | 1.59% |
Daily Std Dev | 20.75% | 11.95% |
Max Drawdown | -24.77% | -57.83% |
Current Drawdown | -1.29% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMS and SPHQ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QVMS vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QVMS achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 27.59% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVMS vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QVMS and SPHQ have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QVMS vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QVMS vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
QVMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than SPHQ's 1.13% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.21% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF | 1.13% | 1.43% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.56% | 1.50% | 1.86% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 2.29% | 1.66% | 1.99% |
Drawdowns
QVMS vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMS drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMS and SPHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QVMS vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.30%. This indicates that QVMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.