QVMM vs. IJH
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH).
QVMM and IJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVMM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. IJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both QVMM and IJH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QVMM or IJH.
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and IJH is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QVMM vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QVMM:
0.84
IJH:
0.90
QVMM:
1.28
IJH:
1.36
QVMM:
1.15
IJH:
1.16
QVMM:
1.46
IJH:
1.66
QVMM:
3.39
IJH:
3.85
QVMM:
3.85%
IJH:
3.64%
QVMM:
15.56%
IJH:
15.56%
QVMM:
-23.40%
IJH:
-55.06%
QVMM:
-6.41%
IJH:
-6.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 1.94% return.
QVMM
2.15%
-3.28%
5.24%
13.66%
N/A
N/A
IJH
1.94%
-3.47%
5.58%
14.67%
10.49%
9.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVMM vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QVMM vs. IJH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QVMM
IJH
QVMM vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QVMM vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than IJH's 1.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.26% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.30% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and IJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QVMM vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.