PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVML vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QVML vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QVML vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
-3.64%17.74%25.87%22.19%-16.25%12.56%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
-1.48%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%11.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's -1.48% return.


QVML

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*

VIG

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
0.22%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVML vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QVML vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML
QVML Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVML vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMLVIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.87

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.33

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.24

5.31

+0.93

QVML vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and VIG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMLVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.87

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.57

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and VIG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QVML vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than VIG's 1.60% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.14%1.10%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.60%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Drawdowns

QVML vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and VIG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMLVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-46.81%

+23.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

-10.83%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-5.73%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-5.55%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.45%

+0.21%

Volatility

QVML vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 4.05%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QVMLVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

4.05%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

7.82%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

15.28%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

14.26%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

16.04%

+0.69%