PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QVML vs. PLRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


QVMLPLRG

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between QVML and PLRG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

QVML vs. PLRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.00%
0
QVML
PLRG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVML vs. PLRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PLRG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


PLRG
Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF
Expense ratio chart for PLRG: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for QVML: current value at 0.11% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.11%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QVML vs. PLRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF (PLRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QVML, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QVML, currently valued at 4.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QVML, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QVML, currently valued at 4.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QVML, currently valued at 21.64, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0021.64
PLRG
Sharpe ratio
No data
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLRG, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.00

QVML vs. PLRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.25
-1.00
QVML
PLRG

Dividends

QVML vs. PLRG - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while PLRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.11%1.43%1.72%0.62%
PLRG
Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF
0.00%1.05%2.65%0.52%

Drawdowns

QVML vs. PLRG - Drawdown Comparison


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.13%
-8.46%
QVML
PLRG

Volatility

QVML vs. PLRG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF (PLRG) at 0.00%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.88%
0
QVML
PLRG