QVAL vs. JEPQ
QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVAL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. QVAL is actively managed, while JEPQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVAL returned 21.66%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for JEPQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVAL charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.
QVAL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.68% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -12.93% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.54% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and JEPQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between QVAL and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVAL
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
QVAL
JEPQ
Technology
QVAL
JEPQ
Industrials
QVAL
JEPQ
Healthcare
QVAL
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
QVAL
JEPQ
Basic Materials
QVAL
JEPQ
Energy
QVAL
JEPQ
Communication Services
QVAL
JEPQ
Real Estate
QVAL
JEPQ
Financial Services
QVAL
-
JEPQ
Utilities
QVAL
-
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
JEPQ
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVAL | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 2.49 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 3.29 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.49 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 3.31 | +1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 16.22 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVAL | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.49 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.00 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -20.07% | -31.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -8.82% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -20.07% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.10% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -3.42% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.79% | +0.34% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 1.26% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 9.07% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 11.73% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 16.61% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 16.61% | +6.18% |
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVAL vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.07% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVAL and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, QVAL leads with 21.66% vs 20.92% for JEPQ. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 21.66% return vs 20.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.
QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVAL and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer