PortfoliosLab logo
QUS vs. IOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QUS and IOO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

QUS vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

160.00%170.00%180.00%190.00%200.00%210.00%220.00%230.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
197.67%
186.11%
QUS
IOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QUS:

0.44

IOO:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

QUS:

0.72

IOO:

0.52

Omega Ratio

QUS:

1.11

IOO:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

QUS:

0.47

IOO:

0.28

Martin Ratio

QUS:

2.33

IOO:

1.27

Ulcer Index

QUS:

2.82%

IOO:

4.28%

Daily Std Dev

QUS:

14.87%

IOO:

20.18%

Max Drawdown

QUS:

-33.78%

IOO:

-55.85%

Current Drawdown

QUS:

-8.64%

IOO:

-12.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's -8.31% return.


QUS

YTD

-3.44%

1M

-3.63%

6M

-5.34%

1Y

7.78%

5Y*

14.08%

10Y*

N/A

IOO

YTD

-8.31%

1M

-5.81%

6M

-7.18%

1Y

5.65%

5Y*

15.53%

10Y*

11.12%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QUS vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for IOO: current value is 0.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IOO: 0.40%
Expense ratio chart for QUS: current value is 0.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QUS: 0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QUS vs. IOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QUS is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QUS is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QUS is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QUS is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QUS is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QUS is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IOO is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IOO is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IOO is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IOO is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QUS vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for QUS, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QUS: 0.44
IOO: 0.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for QUS, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
QUS: 0.72
IOO: 0.52
The chart of Omega ratio for QUS, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
QUS: 1.11
IOO: 1.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for QUS, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
QUS: 0.47
IOO: 0.28
The chart of Martin ratio for QUS, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QUS: 2.33
IOO: 1.27

The current QUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUS and IOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.44
0.27
QUS
IOO

Dividends

QUS vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than IOO's 1.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.55%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
1.17%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%3.52%

Drawdowns

QUS vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and IOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.64%
-12.10%
QUS
IOO

Volatility

QUS vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is 11.04%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 13.88%. This indicates that QUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.04%
13.88%
QUS
IOO