QULL vs. SPLG
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG).
QULL and SPLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QULL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2021. SPLG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 15, 2005. Both QULL and SPLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QULL or SPLG.
Correlation
The correlation between QULL and SPLG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QULL vs. SPLG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QULL:
1.53
SPLG:
2.04
QULL:
2.09
SPLG:
2.72
QULL:
1.27
SPLG:
1.38
QULL:
2.47
SPLG:
3.02
QULL:
9.23
SPLG:
13.51
QULL:
4.25%
SPLG:
1.88%
QULL:
25.72%
SPLG:
12.47%
QULL:
-51.83%
SPLG:
-54.50%
QULL:
-8.60%
SPLG:
-3.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 38.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPLG's 24.63% return.
QULL
38.91%
-1.51%
3.78%
38.27%
N/A
N/A
SPLG
24.63%
-0.30%
7.63%
24.72%
14.60%
13.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QULL vs. SPLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QULL vs. SPLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QULL vs. SPLG - Dividend Comparison
QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 0.93% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% | 1.79% | 1.71% |
Drawdowns
QULL vs. SPLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SPLG drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and SPLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QULL vs. SPLG - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG) at 3.65%. This indicates that QULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.