PortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. MOAT.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QUAL vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QUAL:

0.40

MOAT.L:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

QUAL:

0.68

MOAT.L:

0.58

Omega Ratio

QUAL:

1.09

MOAT.L:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

QUAL:

0.40

MOAT.L:

0.27

Martin Ratio

QUAL:

1.46

MOAT.L:

0.85

Ulcer Index

QUAL:

4.96%

MOAT.L:

6.98%

Daily Std Dev

QUAL:

18.73%

MOAT.L:

16.95%

Max Drawdown

QUAL:

-34.06%

MOAT.L:

-32.78%

Current Drawdown

QUAL:

-0.87%

MOAT.L:

-4.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT.L's 0.45% return.


QUAL

YTD
3.71%
1M
2.04%
6M
4.72%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
12.75%

MOAT.L

YTD
0.45%
1M
2.38%
6M
3.20%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
N/A
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QUAL vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QUAL vs. MOAT.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QUAL is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QUAL is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QUAL is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QUAL is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QUAL is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QUAL is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOAT.L is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOAT.L is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOAT.L is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOAT.L is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOAT.L is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOAT.L is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QUAL vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and MOAT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and MOAT.L is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QUAL vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while MOAT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QUAL
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
1.02%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%1.35%
MOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, roughly equal to the maximum MOAT.L drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and MOAT.L.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QUAL vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.35%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...