QTWO vs. ET

In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a 135.75% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 43.51% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 17.93%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QTWO Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTWO and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%.

The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 7.57%. This indicates that QTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.