PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QTWO vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


QTWOET
YTD Return87.86%24.89%
1Y Return160.29%28.67%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.60%33.05%
5Y Return (Ann)0.37%13.43%
10Y Return (Ann)19.09%1.93%
Sharpe Ratio3.731.64
Daily Std Dev41.26%16.40%
Max Drawdown-85.77%-87.81%
Current Drawdown-44.41%-0.61%

Fundamentals


QTWOET
Market Cap$4.81B$55.44B
EPS-$1.15$1.19
PEG Ratio8.940.52
Total Revenue (TTM)$655.48M$83.63B
Gross Profit (TTM)$314.99M$13.55B
EBITDA (TTM)$29.95M$11.76B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between QTWO and ET is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

QTWO vs. ET - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a 87.86% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 24.89% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 19.09%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
58.75%
8.32%
QTWO
ET

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QTWO vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTWO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QTWO, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QTWO, currently valued at 4.40, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QTWO, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QTWO, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QTWO, currently valued at 37.61, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0037.61
ET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ET, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ET, currently valued at 12.30, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0012.30

QTWO vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTWO Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of QTWO and ET.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.73
1.64
QTWO
ET

Dividends

QTWO vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

QTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
QTWO
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.81%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%

Drawdowns

QTWO vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-44.41%
-0.61%
QTWO
ET

Volatility

QTWO vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 3.19%. This indicates that QTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
9.23%
3.19%
QTWO
ET

Financials

QTWO vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items