QTWO vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QTWO or ET.
Key characteristics
| QTWO | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 125.36% | 34.71% |
| 1Y Return | 173.73% | 39.15% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.99% | 33.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.51% | 18.52% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.85% | 2.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.27 | 2.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.02 | 3.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.27 | 1.71 |
| Martin Ratio | 46.31 | 20.71 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.73% | 1.92% |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.48% | 15.77% |
| Max Drawdown | -85.77% | -87.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.31% | -0.87% |
Fundamentals
| QTWO | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.15B | $58.38B |
| EPS | -$0.96 | $1.36 |
| PEG Ratio | 8.94 | 0.55 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $675.54M | $83.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $329.92M | $14.03B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $16.40M | $12.39B |
Correlation
The correlation between QTWO and ET is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QTWO vs. ET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a 125.36% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 34.71% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 17.85%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QTWO vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QTWO vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
QTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.44% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
QTWO vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QTWO vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.25%. This indicates that QTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
QTWO vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities