Correlation
The correlation between QTWO and ET is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
QTWO vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QTWO or ET.
Performance
QTWO vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
QTWO:
1.02
ET:
0.77
QTWO:
1.58
ET:
1.21
QTWO:
1.20
ET:
1.17
QTWO:
0.66
ET:
0.88
QTWO:
2.59
ET:
2.70
QTWO:
15.60%
ET:
7.97%
QTWO:
42.92%
ET:
27.54%
QTWO:
-85.77%
ET:
-87.81%
QTWO:
-40.34%
ET:
-14.11%
Fundamentals
QTWO:
$5.45B
ET:
$60.67B
QTWO:
-$0.34
ET:
$1.31
QTWO:
8.94
ET:
0.82
QTWO:
7.57
ET:
0.74
QTWO:
9.91
ET:
1.72
QTWO:
$720.69M
ET:
$82.06B
QTWO:
$368.43M
ET:
$15.84B
QTWO:
$51.01M
ET:
$15.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a -13.05% return, which is significantly lower than ET's -7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 13.55%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.
QTWO
-13.05%
10.57%
-16.44%
43.90%
18.40%
1.16%
13.55%
ET
-7.58%
7.78%
-8.84%
20.09%
24.55%
26.96%
1.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QTWO vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QTWO
ET
QTWO vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
QTWO vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
QTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.41% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
QTWO vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and ET.
Loading data...
Volatility
QTWO vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a higher volatility of 13.93% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 9.56%. This indicates that QTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
QTWO vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QTWO vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
QTWO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.99M and revenue of 189.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
QTWO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.19M and revenue of 189.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
QTWO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.75M and revenue of 189.74M, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.