PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QTUM vs. XLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and XLK is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

QTUM vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%220.00%240.00%260.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
248.20%
236.31%
QTUM
XLK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QTUM:

2.09

XLK:

1.03

Sortino Ratio

QTUM:

2.69

XLK:

1.46

Omega Ratio

QTUM:

1.35

XLK:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

QTUM:

3.26

XLK:

1.35

Martin Ratio

QTUM:

9.64

XLK:

4.59

Ulcer Index

QTUM:

5.81%

XLK:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

QTUM:

26.85%

XLK:

22.30%

Max Drawdown

QTUM:

-38.45%

XLK:

-82.05%

Current Drawdown

QTUM:

-5.23%

XLK:

-2.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 0.68% return.


QTUM

YTD

0.90%

1M

-2.41%

6M

31.52%

1Y

52.92%

5Y*

22.65%

10Y*

N/A

XLK

YTD

0.68%

1M

0.97%

6M

6.36%

1Y

20.47%

5Y*

20.38%

10Y*

20.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTUM vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.


QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
Expense ratio chart for QTUM: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for XLK: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QTUM vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QTUM is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QTUM is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QTUM is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QTUM is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLK is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLK is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLK is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLK is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLK is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLK is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QTUM vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.091.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.691.46
The chart of Omega ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.351.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.261.35
The chart of Martin ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 9.64, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.644.59
QTUM
XLK

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.09
1.03
QTUM
XLK

Dividends

QTUM vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than XLK's 0.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.60%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.45%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.65%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%1.75%

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.23%
-2.88%
QTUM
XLK

Volatility

QTUM vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 6.47%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.54%
6.47%
QTUM
XLK
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab