QTUM vs. GRID

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 29.15%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for GRID. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.

Performance

QTUM vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 28.91% return.

QTUM

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 23.63%
• YTD: 53.29%
• 6M: 50.69%
• 1Y: 95.36%
• 3Y*: 52.22%
• 5Y*: 29.15%
• 10Y*: —

GRID

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 28.91%
• 6M: 29.60%
• 1Y: 51.55%
• 3Y*: 26.27%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: 19.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	53.29%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	42.05%	47.99%	-19.02%
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index	28.91%	29.65%	15.18%	21.57%	-13.89%	27.65%	48.84%	42.80%	-20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and GRID is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018	0.81

The correlation between QTUM and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTUM vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTUM	GRID
Technology	84.2%	11.0%
Industrials	9.0%	65.2%
Communication Services	5.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	3.5%
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	20.4%

Return for Risk

QTUM vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 91
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

GRID

GRID Risk / Return Rank: 79
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTUM	GRID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.65	2.67	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	3.50	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.45	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.28	4.42	+1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.69	16.72	+6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTUM vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTUM	GRID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.65	2.67	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	0.85	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.57	+0.50

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and GRID.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTUM	GRID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.45%	-40.56%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.26%	-11.73%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	-20.77%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.45%	-29.64%	-8.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-1.33%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-8.43%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	3.09%	+0.95%

Volatility

QTUM vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.95%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTUM	GRID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	7.95%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.35%	16.08%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.26%	19.39%	+6.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.56%	21.00%	+5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.17%	22.81%	+4.36%

QTUM vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTUM vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than GRID's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index	0.77%	1.01%	1.06%	1.23%	1.26%	0.63%	0.68%	1.26%	1.28%	1.07%	1.07%	1.23%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTUM and GRID in my portfolio?

QTUM and GRID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTUM or GRID?

QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to GRID (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs GRID's -40.56%.

Which ETF is better, QTUM or GRID?

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 17.84% for GRID. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTUM or GRID?

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTUM or GRID?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTUM or GRID?

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between QTUM and GRID?

QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.70% for GRID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.