PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM-USD vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTUM-USD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QTUM (QTUM-USD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM-USD achieves a -47.55% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 5.92% return.


QTUM-USD

1D
-7.96%
1M
-23.88%
YTD
-47.55%
6M
-51.08%
1Y
-64.13%
3Y*
-34.52%
5Y*
-42.45%
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-1.82%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
5.92%
6M
7.78%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM-USD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTUM-USD
QTUM
-47.55%-55.51%-19.33%103.93%-79.08%293.16%38.57%-24.72%-96.59%422.64%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
5.92%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM-USD and QYLD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM-USD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM-USD
QTUM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QTUM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM-USD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QTUM (QTUM-USD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTUM-USDQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.56

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

4.41

-5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

25.62

-26.88

QTUM-USD vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM-USD and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTUM-USDQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

2.50

-3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.55

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.58

-0.82

Drawdowns

QTUM-USD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM-USD and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUM-USDQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.26%

-24.75%

-74.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.35%

-4.97%

-72.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.70%

-19.06%

-68.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.05%

-24.61%

-71.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.26%

-1.87%

-97.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.28%

-3.84%

-89.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.32%

0.85%

+49.47%

Volatility

QTUM-USD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

QTUM (QTUM-USD) has a higher volatility of 19.36% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 2.64%. This indicates that QTUM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUM-USDQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.36%

2.64%

+16.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.68%

7.37%

+43.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.86%

8.78%

+58.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.44%

14.71%

+63.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.44%

15.50%

+83.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM-USD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM-USD has higher volatility (19.36%) compared to QYLD (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM-USD dropped -99.26% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM-USD and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer