QTUM-USD vs. FBGX
Compare and contrast key facts about QTUM (QTUM-USD) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX).
FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QTUM-USD or FBGX.
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM-USD and FBGX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QTUM-USD vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
QTUM-USD
-8.13%
-10.20%
7.54%
-4.75%
5.45%
N/A
FBGX
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QTUM-USD vs. FBGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QTUM-USD
FBGX
QTUM-USD vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QTUM (QTUM-USD) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
QTUM-USD vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
QTUM-USD vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison
QTUM (QTUM-USD) has a higher volatility of 23.39% compared to UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that QTUM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.