QTR vs. ZNQ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO).
QTR and ZNQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. ZNQ.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 2019. Both QTR and ZNQ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QTR or ZNQ.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and ZNQ.TO is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QTR vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QTR:
1.06
ZNQ.TO:
1.61
QTR:
1.52
ZNQ.TO:
2.23
QTR:
1.19
ZNQ.TO:
1.28
QTR:
1.57
ZNQ.TO:
2.25
QTR:
4.59
ZNQ.TO:
7.77
QTR:
3.81%
ZNQ.TO:
3.70%
QTR:
16.50%
ZNQ.TO:
17.82%
QTR:
-31.72%
ZNQ.TO:
-32.09%
QTR:
-4.62%
ZNQ.TO:
-3.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 0.53% return.
QTR
0.34%
-1.55%
8.58%
18.22%
N/A
N/A
ZNQ.TO
0.53%
-1.93%
14.87%
29.72%
20.80%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTR vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QTR vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QTR
ZNQ.TO
QTR vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QTR vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while ZNQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.37% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.47% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, roughly equal to the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and ZNQ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QTR vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 5.06%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.