PortfoliosLab logo
QTOP vs. FNGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and FNGS is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QTOP vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

QTOP:

29.70%

FNGS:

32.59%

Max Drawdown

QTOP:

-23.28%

FNGS:

-48.98%

Current Drawdown

QTOP:

-3.53%

FNGS:

-2.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 4.20% return.


QTOP

YTD

1.07%

1M

8.69%

6M

3.62%

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGS

YTD

4.20%

1M

8.50%

6M

11.14%

1Y

33.83%

3Y*

37.54%

5Y*

29.02%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN

QTOP vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QTOP vs. FNGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP

FNGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGS is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGS is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QTOP vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

QTOP vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

QTOP vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and FNGS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QTOP vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...