PortfoliosLab logo
QSR vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between QSR and GIS is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

QSR vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QSR:

0.09

GIS:

-0.91

Sortino Ratio

QSR:

0.28

GIS:

-1.13

Omega Ratio

QSR:

1.03

GIS:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

QSR:

0.08

GIS:

-0.52

Martin Ratio

QSR:

0.21

GIS:

-1.37

Ulcer Index

QSR:

8.97%

GIS:

13.95%

Daily Std Dev

QSR:

23.67%

GIS:

21.89%

Max Drawdown

QSR:

-63.03%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

QSR:

-11.01%

GIS:

-34.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QSR:

$31.61B

GIS:

$29.79B

EPS

QSR:

$2.95

GIS:

$4.55

PE Ratio

QSR:

23.62

GIS:

11.96

PEG Ratio

QSR:

1.18

GIS:

3.47

PS Ratio

QSR:

3.60

GIS:

1.52

PB Ratio

QSR:

7.33

GIS:

3.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

QSR:

$8.78B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QSR:

$4.10B

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

QSR:

$2.63B

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 8.58%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.18% annualized return.


QSR

YTD

9.34%

1M

13.45%

6M

6.50%

1Y

2.11%

5Y*

10.31%

10Y*

8.58%

GIS

YTD

-11.74%

1M

-2.37%

6M

-10.96%

1Y

-19.74%

5Y*

0.80%

10Y*

3.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QSR vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QSR is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QSR is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QSR is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QSR is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QSR is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QSR is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QSR vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QSR vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than GIS's 4.35% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.34%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%0.00%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.35%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

QSR vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QSR vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 5.47% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

QSR vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
2.11B
4.84B
(QSR) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QSR vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
33.4%
33.9%
(QSR) Gross Margin
(GIS) Gross Margin
QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 704.00M and revenue of 2.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 435.00M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 159.00M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.