QSR vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QSR or GIS.
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and GIS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QSR vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QSR:
-0.35
GIS:
0.13
QSR:
-0.36
GIS:
0.31
QSR:
0.96
GIS:
1.04
QSR:
-0.40
GIS:
0.08
QSR:
-0.65
GIS:
0.38
QSR:
11.79%
GIS:
6.44%
QSR:
21.94%
GIS:
18.54%
QSR:
-63.03%
GIS:
-45.08%
QSR:
-16.63%
GIS:
-25.99%
Fundamentals
QSR:
$30.58B
GIS:
$36.60B
QSR:
$3.99
GIS:
$4.20
QSR:
16.91
GIS:
15.70
QSR:
1.79
GIS:
3.34
QSR:
$7.97B
GIS:
$14.66B
QSR:
$4.74B
GIS:
$5.01B
QSR:
$2.63B
GIS:
$3.00B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a -11.70% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's 1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 8.42%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.08% annualized return.
QSR
-11.70%
-2.94%
-1.91%
-9.63%
4.17%
8.42%
GIS
1.19%
-0.30%
-3.45%
2.66%
7.04%
5.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QSR vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QSR vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than GIS's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.47% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.74% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
QSR vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QSR vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.22%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
QSR vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities