PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QSR vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


QSRGIS
YTD Return-11.04%1.97%
1Y Return1.85%1.75%
3Y Return (Ann)9.59%3.68%
5Y Return (Ann)3.58%7.49%
Sharpe Ratio0.090.07
Sortino Ratio0.290.23
Omega Ratio1.031.03
Calmar Ratio0.110.05
Martin Ratio0.190.26
Ulcer Index10.71%5.16%
Daily Std Dev22.02%18.97%
Max Drawdown-63.03%-45.08%
Current Drawdown-16.00%-25.42%

Fundamentals


QSRGIS
Market Cap$30.63B$35.59B
EPS$3.99$4.20
PE Ratio17.0115.26
PEG Ratio1.793.34
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.98B$19.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.13B$6.78B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.17B$4.19B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between QSR and GIS is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

QSR vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a -11.04% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's 1.97% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.30%
-7.61%
QSR
GIS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QSR vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QSR, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QSR, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QSR, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QSR, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QSR, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.19
GIS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GIS, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.26

QSR vs. GIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is comparable to the GIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.09
0.07
QSR
GIS

Dividends

QSR vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than GIS's 3.71% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.37%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%0.00%0.00%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
3.71%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%2.85%

Drawdowns

QSR vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-16.00%
-25.42%
QSR
GIS

Volatility

QSR vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 4.76%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.32%
4.76%
QSR
GIS

Financials

QSR vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items