QSI vs. LAES
QSI (Quantum-Si incorporated) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. QSI operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, QSI returned -28.91%/yr vs -37.54%/yr for LAES. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSI vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSI achieves a -20.97% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -28.31% return.
QSI
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- 6M
- -28.16%
- YTD
- -20.97%
- 1Y
- -49.75%
- 3Y*
- -28.91%
- 5Y*
- -40.85%
- 10Y*
- —
LAES
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- 6M
- -37.70%
- YTD
- -28.31%
- 1Y
- -25.34%
- 3Y*
- -37.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSI vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QSI Quantum-Si incorporated | -20.97% | -59.26% | 34.33% | 16.86% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -28.31% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSI and LAES is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, QSI and LAES have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
QSI:
$171.97M
LAES:
$386.43M
QSI:
$1.85M
LAES:
$35.37M
QSI:
-$3.71M
LAES:
$13.21M
QSI:
-$104.05M
LAES:
-$41.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSI vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
QSI
LAES
QSI vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum-Si incorporated (QSI) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSI | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.04 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.35 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -0.56 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSI vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSI drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, roughly equal to the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSI and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSI | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -98.44% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.95% | -72.68% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.73% | -97.22% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.59% | -87.66% | -5.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -84.63% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.73% | 44.99% | +6.74% |
Volatility
QSI vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
Quantum-Si incorporated (QSI) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES) have volatilities of 19.73% and 19.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSI | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.73% | 19.57% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.58% | 64.33% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.92% | 107.73% | -15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 125.07% | 168.54% | -43.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.73% | 168.54% | -43.81% |
Dividends
QSI vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
Neither QSI nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QSI vs. LAES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum-Si incorporated and SEALSQ Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QSI and LAES have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSI has higher volatility (19.73%) compared to LAES (19.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSI dropped -95.33% vs LAES's -98.44%.
LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSI and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer