QSI vs. LAES
QSI (Quantum-Si incorporated) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. QSI operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, QSI returned -17.20%/yr vs -40.74%/yr for LAES. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSI vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSI achieves a -20.00% return, which is significantly lower than LAES's -11.64% return.
QSI
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -16.98%
- YTD
- -20.00%
- 6M
- -28.46%
- 1Y
- -46.67%
- 3Y*
- -17.20%
- 5Y*
- -39.66%
- 10Y*
- —
LAES
- 1D
- 7.74%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -11.64%
- 6M
- -19.71%
- 1Y
- -7.61%
- 3Y*
- -40.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSI vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QSI Quantum-Si incorporated | -20.00% | -59.26% | 34.33% | 16.86% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -11.64% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSI and LAES is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, QSI and LAES have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
QSI:
-$0.51
LAES:
-$0.43
QSI:
95.85
LAES:
11.00
QSI:
$1.85M
LAES:
$35.37M
QSI:
-$3.71M
LAES:
$13.21M
QSI:
-$104.05M
LAES:
-$41.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSI vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
QSI
LAES
QSI vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum-Si incorporated (QSI) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSI | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.08 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.11 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -0.17 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSI vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSI drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, roughly equal to the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSI and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSI | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -98.44% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.95% | -72.68% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.73% | -97.87% | +14.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.51% | -84.80% | -8.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.33% | -84.60% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.38% | 44.47% | +5.91% |
Volatility
QSI vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
Quantum-Si incorporated (QSI) has a higher volatility of 29.41% compared to SEALSQ Corp (LAES) at 26.98%. This indicates that QSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSI | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.41% | 26.98% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.04% | 65.56% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.15% | 109.54% | -15.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 125.29% | 169.84% | -44.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 125.20% | 169.84% | -44.64% |
Dividends
QSI vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
Neither QSI nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QSI vs. LAES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum-Si incorporated and SEALSQ Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QSI and LAES have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSI has higher volatility (29.41%) compared to LAES (26.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSI dropped -95.33% vs LAES's -98.44%.
LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSI and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer