QRHC vs. LQDT

In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than LQDT's 81.29% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed LQDT with an annualized return of -6.57%, while LQDT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.24% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QRHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the LQDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRHC and LQDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither QRHC nor LQDT has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -97.70%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and LQDT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) is 11.28%, while Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a volatility of 29.57%. This indicates that QRHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.