QRHC vs. LQDT
QRHC (Quest Resource Holding Corporation) and LQDT (Liquidity Services, Inc.) are both stocks. QRHC operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while LQDT operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, QRHC returned -8.57%/yr vs 17.99%/yr for LQDT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QRHC vs. LQDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -25.81% return, which is significantly lower than LQDT's 26.82% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed LQDT with an annualized return of -8.57%, while LQDT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.99% annualized return.
QRHC
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 20.00%
- YTD
- -25.81%
- 6M
- -28.50%
- 1Y
- -35.51%
- 3Y*
- -38.82%
- 5Y*
- -25.83%
- 10Y*
- -8.57%
LQDT
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- 11.65%
- YTD
- 26.82%
- 6M
- 24.12%
- 1Y
- 67.42%
- 3Y*
- 35.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 17.99%
QRHC vs. LQDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRHC Quest Resource Holding Corporation | -25.81% | -71.38% | -11.32% | 19.97% | -11.96% | 200.43% | 5.96% | 60.29% | -40.87% | -6.12% |
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 26.82% | -6.13% | 87.62% | 22.40% | -36.32% | 38.78% | 166.95% | -3.40% | 27.22% | -50.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRHC and LQDT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010 | 0.08 |
The correlation between QRHC and LQDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QRHC:
$29.25M
LQDT:
$1.24B
QRHC:
-$0.35
LQDT:
$0.93
QRHC:
0.12
LQDT:
2.59
QRHC:
0.76
LQDT:
5.59
QRHC:
$243.52M
LQDT:
$479.92M
QRHC:
$36.00M
LQDT:
$111.22M
QRHC:
$2.82M
LQDT:
$52.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRHC vs. LQDT — Risk / Return Rank
QRHC
LQDT
QRHC vs. LQDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QRHC | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.15 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 9.15 | -10.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QRHC vs. LQDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -98.23%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and LQDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRHC | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.23% | -95.31% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.18% | -21.53% | -42.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.90% | -41.08% | -50.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.90% | -57.57% | -34.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.90% | -72.78% | -19.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.17% | -41.10% | -56.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.33% | -62.16% | -12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.22% | 7.39% | +26.83% |
Volatility
QRHC vs. LQDT - Volatility Comparison
Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a higher volatility of 23.44% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) at 8.12%. This indicates that QRHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRHC | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.44% | 8.12% | +15.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.88% | 20.87% | +43.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.93% | 34.94% | +46.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.34% | 44.95% | +19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.60% | 53.11% | +16.49% |
Dividends
QRHC vs. LQDT - Dividend Comparison
Neither QRHC nor LQDT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QRHC vs. LQDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QRHC vs. LQDT - Profitability Comparison
QRHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.67M and revenue of 61.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.7%.
LQDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -54.45M and revenue of 120.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -45.1%.
QRHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 242.00K and revenue of 61.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.
LQDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.62M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
QRHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a net income of -2.32M and revenue of 61.74M, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
LQDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.52M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QRHC and LQDT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QRHC has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to LQDT (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRHC dropped -98.23% vs LQDT's -95.31%.
LQDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRHC and LQDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer