QRHC vs. LQDT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT).

Performance

QRHC vs. LQDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QRHC vs. LQDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QRHC Quest Resource Holding Corporation	-36.02%	-71.38%	-11.32%	19.97%	-11.96%	200.43%	5.96%	60.29%	-40.87%	-6.12%
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc.	1.81%	-6.13%	87.62%	22.40%	-36.32%	38.78%	166.95%	-3.40%	27.22%	-50.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QRHC : $25.12M LQDT : $996.63M
EPS QRHC : -$0.73 LQDT : $0.92
PS Ratio QRHC : 0.10 LQDT : 2.10
PB Ratio QRHC : 0.62 LQDT : 4.63
Total Revenue (TTM) QRHC : $250.22M LQDT : $475.56M
Gross Profit (TTM) QRHC : $42.54M LQDT : $158.65M
EBITDA (TTM) QRHC : $1.56M LQDT : $48.97M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -36.02% return, which is significantly lower than LQDT's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed LQDT with an annualized return of -10.68%, while LQDT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.58% annualized return.

QRHC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -30.00%
• YTD: -36.02%
• 6M: -24.68%
• 1Y: -54.58%
• 3Y*: -42.13%
• 5Y*: -21.45%
• 10Y*: -10.68%

LQDT

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: -2.22%
• 3Y*: 32.82%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: 19.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QRHC vs. LQDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRHC

QRHC Risk / Return Rank: 12
QRHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
QRHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
QRHC Omega Ratio Rank: 16
QRHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
QRHC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LQDT

LQDT Risk / Return Rank: 37
LQDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LQDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
LQDT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LQDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LQDT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRHC vs. LQDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRHC	LQDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	-0.06	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.74	0.20	-0.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.03	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.02	-0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.66	-0.03	-1.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRHC vs. LQDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the LQDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRHC and LQDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRHC	LQDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64	-0.06	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	0.20	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	0.37	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.09	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between QRHC and LQDT is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QRHC vs. LQDT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QRHC nor LQDT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QRHC vs. LQDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -98.23%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and LQDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRHC	LQDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.23%	-95.31%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.91%	-30.90%	-37.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.90%	-58.60%	-33.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.90%	-72.78%	-19.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.56%	-52.71%	-44.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.03%	-62.35%	-11.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.66%	17.39%	+15.27%

Volatility

QRHC vs. LQDT - Volatility Comparison

Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a higher volatility of 44.96% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) at 10.82%. This indicates that QRHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRHC	LQDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.96%	10.82%	+34.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.47%	28.21%	+41.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	85.27%	39.28%	+45.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.14%	49.07%	+16.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.53%	53.30%	+16.23%

Financials

QRHC vs. LQDT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

QRHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.11M and revenue of 58.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.5%.

LQDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

QRHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 547.00K and revenue of 58.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

LQDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.37M and revenue of 121.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

QRHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a net income of -1.66M and revenue of 58.91M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.

LQDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.49M and revenue of 121.22M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.