PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRHC vs. INFU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QRHC vs. INFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -25.81% return, which is significantly lower than INFU's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed INFU with an annualized return of -8.57%, while INFU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.


QRHC

1D
-3.50%
1M
20.00%
YTD
-25.81%
6M
-28.50%
1Y
-35.51%
3Y*
-38.82%
5Y*
-25.83%
10Y*
-8.57%

INFU

1D
1.79%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
1.23%
6M
0.44%
1Y
46.93%
3Y*
-2.78%
5Y*
-12.90%
10Y*
13.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRHC vs. INFU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding Corporation
-25.81%-71.38%-11.32%19.97%-11.96%200.43%5.96%60.29%-40.87%-6.12%
INFU
InfuSystem Holdings Inc.
1.23%6.15%-19.83%21.43%-49.03%-9.32%120.16%147.97%49.57%-9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QRHC and INFU is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QRHC:

$29.25M

INFU:

$189.72M

EPS

QRHC:

-$0.35

INFU:

$0.38

PS Ratio

QRHC:

0.12

INFU:

1.34

PB Ratio

QRHC:

0.76

INFU:

3.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

QRHC:

$243.52M

INFU:

$142.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

QRHC:

$36.00M

INFU:

$80.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

QRHC:

$2.82M

INFU:

$23.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRHC vs. INFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRHC
QRHC Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QRHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRHC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QRHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRHC Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

INFU
INFU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
INFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
INFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRHC vs. INFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRHCINFUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.19

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

1.51

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

3.40

-4.44

QRHC vs. INFU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the INFU Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRHC and INFU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRHC vs. INFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -98.23%, which is greater than INFU's maximum drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and INFU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRHCINFUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.23%

-79.49%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.18%

-31.17%

-33.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.90%

-58.22%

-33.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

-78.13%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.90%

-79.49%

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.17%

-60.38%

-36.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.33%

-42.03%

-32.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.22%

13.83%

+20.39%

Volatility

QRHC vs. INFU - Volatility Comparison

Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a higher volatility of 23.44% compared to InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) at 12.20%. This indicates that QRHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRHCINFUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.44%

12.20%

+11.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.88%

36.39%

+27.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.93%

53.93%

+28.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.34%

53.58%

+10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.60%

54.55%

+15.05%

Dividends

QRHC vs. INFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither QRHC nor INFU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QRHC vs. INFU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and InfuSystem Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
61.74M
33.68M
(QRHC) Total Revenue
(INFU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QRHC vs. INFU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
15.7%
58.4%
Portfolio components
QRHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.67M and revenue of 61.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.7%.

INFU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.68M and revenue of 33.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

QRHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 242.00K and revenue of 61.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

INFU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.59M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

QRHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a net income of -2.32M and revenue of 61.74M, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.

INFU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.02M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QRHC and INFU have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRHC has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to INFU (12.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRHC dropped -98.23% vs INFU's -79.49%.

INFU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRHC and INFU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer