QRHC vs. ETN
Compare and contrast key facts about Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QRHC or ETN.
Correlation
The correlation between QRHC and ETN is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QRHC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QRHC:
-0.35
ETN:
0.95
QRHC:
-0.25
ETN:
1.31
QRHC:
0.97
ETN:
1.21
QRHC:
-0.17
ETN:
1.55
QRHC:
-0.64
ETN:
4.35
QRHC:
23.11%
ETN:
7.07%
QRHC:
42.07%
ETN:
32.52%
QRHC:
-97.70%
ETN:
-68.95%
QRHC:
-88.10%
ETN:
-15.87%
Fundamentals
QRHC:
$119.41M
ETN:
$123.12B
QRHC:
-$0.38
ETN:
$9.41
QRHC:
0.99
ETN:
3.20
QRHC:
$218.56M
ETN:
$18.64B
QRHC:
$34.54M
ETN:
$7.07B
QRHC:
$10.43M
ETN:
$4.16B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's -4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of -5.32%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.89% annualized return.
QRHC
-10.77%
-6.30%
-31.28%
-15.70%
18.89%
-5.32%
ETN
-4.30%
-4.45%
4.85%
28.47%
30.26%
20.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QRHC vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QRHC
ETN
QRHC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QRHC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
QRHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRHC Quest Resource Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 2.43% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
QRHC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -97.70%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QRHC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) is 10.92%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 18.66%. This indicates that QRHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
QRHC vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities