PortfoliosLab logo
QRHC vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between QRHC and ETN is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

QRHC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QRHC:

-1.22

ETN:

-0.10

Sortino Ratio

QRHC:

-2.37

ETN:

0.14

Omega Ratio

QRHC:

0.68

ETN:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

QRHC:

-0.81

ETN:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

QRHC:

-1.92

ETN:

-0.24

Ulcer Index

QRHC:

40.09%

ETN:

14.30%

Daily Std Dev

QRHC:

63.49%

ETN:

38.44%

Max Drawdown

QRHC:

-97.70%

ETN:

-68.95%

Current Drawdown

QRHC:

-95.61%

ETN:

-14.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QRHC:

$44.16M

ETN:

$125.63B

EPS

QRHC:

-$1.20

ETN:

$9.92

PEG Ratio

QRHC:

1.24

ETN:

2.69

PS Ratio

QRHC:

0.16

ETN:

4.96

PB Ratio

QRHC:

1.07

ETN:

6.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

QRHC:

$284.31M

ETN:

$25.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QRHC:

$44.52M

ETN:

$9.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

QRHC:

-$9.71M

ETN:

$5.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -67.08% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's -2.56% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of -13.19%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 19.27% annualized return.


QRHC

YTD

-67.08%

1M

-5.93%

6M

-70.19%

1Y

-77.04%

3Y*

-21.77%

5Y*

9.17%

10Y*

-13.19%

ETN

YTD

-2.56%

1M

12.25%

6M

-14.32%

1Y

-4.56%

3Y*

36.03%

5Y*

34.97%

10Y*

19.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Eaton Corporation plc

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QRHC vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QRHC is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QRHC is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QRHC is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETN is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETN is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETN is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETN is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETN is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETN is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QRHC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QRHC Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRHC and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

QRHC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

QRHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.23%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%

Drawdowns

QRHC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -97.70%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and ETN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QRHC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a higher volatility of 25.60% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 6.08%. This indicates that QRHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

QRHC vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
68.43M
6.38B
(QRHC) Total Revenue
(ETN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QRHC vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
16.0%
38.4%
(QRHC) Gross Margin
(ETN) Gross Margin
QRHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.93M and revenue of 68.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 6.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

QRHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported an operating income of -8.16M and revenue of 68.43M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.9%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

QRHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a net income of -10.41M and revenue of 68.43M, resulting in a net margin of -15.2%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 964.00M and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.