PortfoliosLab logo
QRHC vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between QRHC and ETN is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

QRHC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-70.55%
-14.23%
QRHC
ETN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QRHC:

-1.29

ETN:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

QRHC:

-2.56

ETN:

0.08

Omega Ratio

QRHC:

0.65

ETN:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

QRHC:

-0.81

ETN:

-0.14

Martin Ratio

QRHC:

-1.83

ETN:

-0.35

Ulcer Index

QRHC:

42.22%

ETN:

14.02%

Daily Std Dev

QRHC:

59.22%

ETN:

38.27%

Max Drawdown

QRHC:

-97.70%

ETN:

-68.95%

Current Drawdown

QRHC:

-95.03%

ETN:

-18.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QRHC:

$50.07M

ETN:

$117.42B

EPS

QRHC:

-$0.73

ETN:

$9.50

PEG Ratio

QRHC:

1.24

ETN:

2.51

PS Ratio

QRHC:

0.17

ETN:

4.62

PB Ratio

QRHC:

0.92

ETN:

6.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

QRHC:

$215.88M

ETN:

$25.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QRHC:

$33.59M

ETN:

$9.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

QRHC:

$1.44M

ETN:

$5.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -62.77% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's -6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of -12.91%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.74% annualized return.


QRHC

YTD

-62.77%

1M

0.41%

6M

-70.56%

1Y

-76.39%

5Y*

14.17%

10Y*

-12.91%

ETN

YTD

-6.82%

1M

22.51%

6M

-14.23%

1Y

-5.83%

5Y*

32.95%

10Y*

18.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Eaton Corporation plc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QRHC vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QRHC is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QRHC is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QRHC is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QRHC is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETN is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETN is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETN is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETN is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETN is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETN is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QRHC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QRHC Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRHC and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.29
-0.15
QRHC
ETN

Dividends

QRHC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

QRHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.29%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%

Drawdowns

QRHC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -97.70%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-95.03%
-18.09%
QRHC
ETN

Volatility

QRHC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a higher volatility of 26.82% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 15.23%. This indicates that QRHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
26.82%
15.23%
QRHC
ETN

Financials

QRHC vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
69.97M
6.38B
(QRHC) Total Revenue
(ETN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QRHC vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
15.3%
38.4%
(QRHC) Gross Margin
(ETN) Gross Margin
QRHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.73M and revenue of 69.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 6.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

QRHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported an operating income of -7.18M and revenue of 69.97M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.3%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

QRHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a net income of -9.51M and revenue of 69.97M, resulting in a net margin of -13.6%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 964.00M and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.


Competitive Comparison

QRHC - Quest Resource Holding Corporation
ETN - Eaton Corporation plc

See how gross margin, operating margin, and net margin compare for the largest companies in the Waste Management industry.

SymbolNameMarket CapGross MarginOperating MarginNet Margin
WMWaste Management, Inc.94.14B39.4%16.8%10.6%
UWS.DEWaste Management Inc83.34B39.4%16.8%10.6%
RSGRepublic Services, Inc.78.35B42.3%20.1%12.4%
WCN.TOWaste Connections, Inc.70.78B42.0%17.8%10.8%
WCNWaste Connections, Inc.51.14B42.0%17.5%10.8%
VEOEYVeolia Environnement SA ADR26.66B
GFL.TOGFL Environmental Inc.25.59B18.4%0.1%
VIE.PAVeolia Environnement S.A.23.55B17.5%7.3%2.0%
VVD.DEVeolia Environnement S.A23.53B17.5%7.3%2.0%
0257.HKChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd21.75B

QRHC vs. ETN - Valuation Comparison

The chart below illustrates the valuation comparison between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting four key metrics: Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio, Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) Ratio, Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio, and Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio.

ETN - PE Ratio

The chart displays the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio for ETN, comparing it with other companies in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry. Currently, ETN has a P/E ratio of 31.5. This P/E ratio is in line with the industry average, suggesting the stock may be fairly valued relative to its earnings.

QRHC - PEG Ratio

The chart shows the Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio for QRHC compared to other companies in the Waste Management industry. QRHC currently has a PEG ratio of 1.2. This PEG ratio is close to the industry average, suggesting the stock’s valuation is balanced against its growth outlook.

ETN - PEG Ratio

The chart shows the Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio for ETN compared to other companies in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry. ETN currently has a PEG ratio of 2.5. This PEG ratio is higher than the industry average, which may suggest the stock is overvalued relative to its expected earnings growth.

QRHC - PS Ratio

This chart shows the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio for QRHC relative to other companies in the Waste Management industry. Currently, QRHC has a P/S ratio of 0.2. This P/S ratio is low compared to the industry average. It may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its revenue, or that the market expects slower growth or lower margins.

ETN - PS Ratio

This chart shows the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio for ETN relative to other companies in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry. Currently, ETN has a P/S ratio of 4.6. This P/S ratio is high relative to other companies in the industry. It could mean the stock is overvalued, or that investors expect strong future growth and profitability.

QRHC - PB Ratio

The chart illustrates the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio for QRHC in comparison with other companies in the Waste Management industry. Currently, QRHC has a P/B value of 0.9. This P/B ratio is in line with the industry average, suggesting the stock is valued fairly in relation to its book value.

ETN - PB Ratio

The chart illustrates the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio for ETN in comparison with other companies in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry. Currently, ETN has a P/B value of 6.4. This P/B ratio is higher than most companies in the industry. It may suggest the stock is overvalued or that investors expect the company to generate high returns on its assets.

User Portfolios with QRHC or ETN


(no name)
11%
YTD
AGG
VPL
TIP
VGK
VNQ
IAU
VBR
VOO
HDV
IDV
HYBB
HCA
HES
TPR
VICI
KR
PNC
QCOM
GEHC
FDX
MSFT
NVDA
TSM
BABA
VZ
CMCSA
SPY
IWM
VXUS
VWO
IGF
REET
EWH
EWJ
FXI
TLT
AGG
BND
BNDX
GLD
SLV
1 / 54

Recent discussions