PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QRHC vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

QRHC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.97%
11.40%
QRHC
ETN

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRHC achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 58.66% return. Over the past 10 years, QRHC has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of -4.43%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.80% annualized return.


QRHC

YTD

-2.05%

1M

-12.86%

6M

-22.96%

1Y

-0.83%

5Y (annualized)

23.83%

10Y (annualized)

-4.43%

ETN

YTD

58.66%

1M

9.71%

6M

11.40%

1Y

66.91%

5Y (annualized)

35.84%

10Y (annualized)

21.80%

Fundamentals


QRHCETN
Market Cap$142.88M$142.45B
EPS-$0.38$9.38
PEG Ratio1.193.11
Total Revenue (TTM)$287.90M$24.61B
Gross Profit (TTM)$43.64M$9.42B
EBITDA (TTM)$12.62M$5.48B

Key characteristics


QRHCETN
Sharpe Ratio-0.022.42
Sortino Ratio0.292.97
Omega Ratio1.031.43
Calmar Ratio-0.013.38
Martin Ratio-0.0510.89
Ulcer Index16.45%6.14%
Daily Std Dev42.80%27.64%
Max Drawdown-97.70%-68.95%
Current Drawdown-85.26%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between QRHC and ETN is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QRHC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QRHC, currently valued at -0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.022.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for QRHC, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.292.97
The chart of Omega ratio for QRHC, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.031.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for QRHC, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.013.38
The chart of Martin ratio for QRHC, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.0510.89
QRHC
ETN

The current QRHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRHC and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.02
2.42
QRHC
ETN

Dividends

QRHC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

QRHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.00%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%2.21%

Drawdowns

QRHC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRHC drawdown since its inception was -97.70%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRHC and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-85.26%
0
QRHC
ETN

Volatility

QRHC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 9.04%. This indicates that QRHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.50%
9.04%
QRHC
ETN

Financials

QRHC vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Resource Holding Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items