QQQN vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
QQQN and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQN is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Q-50. It was launched on Sep 10, 2020. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both QQQN and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QQQN or XLK.
Key characteristics
| QQQN | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.58% | 2.55% |
| 1Y Return | 14.28% | 34.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.30% | 13.23% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.90 | 1.84 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.66% | 17.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.89% | -82.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -23.30% | -6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQN and XLK is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QQQN vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQN having a 2.58% return and XLK slightly lower at 2.55%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQN vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QQQN vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QQQN vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
QQQN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than XLK's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.87% | 0.64% | 0.90% | 0.33% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
QQQN vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QQQN vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) is 5.33%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that QQQN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.