PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQM vs. QQQJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQM vs. QQQJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQM vs. QQQJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-4.75%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
-0.15%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than QQQJ's -0.15% return.


QQQM

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*

QQQJ

1D
1.46%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
2.36%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQM vs. QQQJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQM and QQQJ have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QQQM vs. QQQJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. QQQJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQMQQQJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.80

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.06

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.35

8.43

-1.08

QQQM vs. QQQJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the QQQJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and QQQJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQMQQQJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.16

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.31

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and QQQJ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQM vs. QQQJ - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than QQQJ's 0.88% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.88%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. QQQJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum QQQJ drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and QQQJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQMQQQJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-39.57%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-13.54%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

-39.57%

+4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-6.66%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-16.19%

+7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.30%

+0.14%

Volatility

QQQM vs. QQQJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 6.58%, while Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQMQQQJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

8.53%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

14.59%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.45%

22.41%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

21.98%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.26%

22.11%

+0.15%