QQQJ vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQQJ tracks the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index while QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

QQQJ vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQJ

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -3.19%
• 6M: 15.30%
• YTD: 19.53%
• 1Y: 34.13%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.75%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	$4.82M	$6.21M	$6.07M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

QQQJ vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	18.69%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

QQQJ vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQJ	QQQN
Technology	34.2%	47.3%
Healthcare	23.3%	19.9%
Industrials	13.6%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	13.7%
Communication Services	5.9%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	1.4%
Utilities	2.8%	1.6%
Basic Materials	2.5%	1.9%
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Energy	1.1%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQJ

QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 77
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 82

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQJ vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQJ	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.02	—	—

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQJ	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.57%	0.00%	-39.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.66%	0.00%	-3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	0.00%	-15.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQJ	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.15%	0.00%	+19.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.14%	0.00%	+22.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.96%	0.00%	+21.96%

QQQJ vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQJ vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	0.56%	0.85%	0.77%	0.67%	0.76%	0.91%	0.09%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QQQJ or QQQN?

On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQJ or QQQN?

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQJ or QQQN?

QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between QQQJ and QQQN?

QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.18% for QQQN.