PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QQQI vs. QDTE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQI vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.94%
14.44%
QQQI
QDTE

Returns By Period


QQQI

YTD

N/A

1M

0.64%

6M

8.95%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

QDTE

YTD

N/A

1M

1.65%

6M

14.44%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


QQQIQDTE
Daily Std Dev14.59%17.13%
Max Drawdown-10.67%-10.74%
Current Drawdown-2.19%-2.16%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQI vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for QDTE: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for QQQI: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between QQQI and QDTE is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQQI vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
QQQI
QDTE

Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

QQQI vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, less than QDTE's 24.24% yield.


TTM
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
10.61%
QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
24.24%

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, roughly equal to the maximum QDTE drawdown of -10.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and QDTE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.19%
-2.16%
QQQI
QDTE

Volatility

QQQI vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 4.10%, while Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.10%
5.26%
QQQI
QDTE