QQQI vs. FEPI
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while FEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 29.68% vs 32.79% for FEPI. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPI.
Performance
QQQI vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than FEPI's 10.45% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEPI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.04% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.45% | 18.33% | 12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and FEPI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QQQI and FEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQI vs. FEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQI
FEPI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQI
FEPI
Communication Services
QQQI
FEPI
Consumer Cyclical
QQQI
FEPI
Consumer Defensive
QQQI
FEPI
-
Healthcare
QQQI
FEPI
-
Industrials
QQQI
FEPI
-
Utilities
QQQI
FEPI
-
Basic Materials
QQQI
FEPI
-
Energy
QQQI
FEPI
-
Financial Services
QQQI
FEPI
-
Real Estate
QQQI
FEPI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
FEPI
QQQI vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQI | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.55 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 8.56 | +5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQI | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.99 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.16 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum FEPI drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and FEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -23.56% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -12.91% | +3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -1.43% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -3.50% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 3.84% | -1.70% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 2.69%, while REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 3.31% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 12.54% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 16.52% | -3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 19.00% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 19.00% | -1.95% |
QQQI vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQI vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.24%, less than FEPI's 23.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 23.91% | 25.48% | 27.18% | 4.21% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.24% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQI and FEPI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEPI has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to QQQI (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs FEPI's -23.56%.
On 1-year performance, FEPI leads with 32.79% vs 29.68% for QQQI. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEPI has performed better with a 32.79% return vs 29.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 23.91%, compared with 13.24% for QQQI.
QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FEPI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.65% for FEPI.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and FEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer