QQQE vs. SPXU
QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) and SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQE returned 14.93%/yr vs -41.50%/yr for SPXU. Their -0.88 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QQQE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPXU.
Performance
QQQE vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQE achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPXU's -30.45% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQE has outperformed SPXU with an annualized return of 14.93%, while SPXU has yielded a comparatively lower -41.50% annualized return.
QQQE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 19.12%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 24.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.57%
SPXU
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -29.62%
- YTD
- -30.45%
- 1Y
- -44.77%
- 3Y*
- -42.04%
- 5Y*
- -33.66%
- 10Y*
- -41.50%
- ALL TIME*
- -42.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.56M | $23.28M | $25.02M | |
| $347.12M | $308.29M | $360.15M |
QQQE vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 18.72% | 14.58% | 6.98% | 33.76% | -24.47% | 17.93% | 37.85% | 36.43% | -5.40% | 26.53% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -30.45% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQE and SPXU is -0.87, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2012 | -0.88 |
The correlation between QQQE and SPXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQE vs. SPXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQE
SPXU
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQE
SPXU
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQE
SPXU
-
Industrials
QQQE
SPXU
-
Communication Services
QQQE
SPXU
-
Healthcare
QQQE
SPXU
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQE
SPXU
-
Utilities
QQQE
SPXU
-
Energy
QQQE
SPXU
-
Basic Materials
QQQE
SPXU
-
Financial Services
QQQE
SPXU
Real Estate
QQQE
SPXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQE vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank
QQQE
SPXU
QQQE vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQE | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.80 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | -1.00 | +3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | -1.81 | +10.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQE vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQE drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, smaller than the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQE and SPXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQE | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.14% | -99.99% | +67.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -45.07% | +35.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.38% | -85.17% | +63.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.14% | -90.73% | +58.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.14% | -99.58% | +67.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -99.99% | +98.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -93.38% | +88.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 25.44% | -22.50% |
Volatility
QQQE vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) is 4.70%, while ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a volatility of 12.32%. This indicates that QQQE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQE | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 12.32% | -7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 30.95% | -17.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.08% | 38.41% | -22.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 50.77% | -30.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 53.45% | -32.67% |
QQQE vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQE vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison
QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SPXU's 7.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.56% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.46% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQE and SPXU have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to QQQE (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQE dropped -32.14% vs SPXU's -99.99%.
On 10-year performance, QQQE leads with 14.93% vs -41.50% for SPXU. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 14.93% return vs -41.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 0.56% for QQQE.
QQQE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPXU is S&P 500. QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QQQE and 0.90% for SPXU.
QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQE and SPXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer