PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQE vs. SPXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQE vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQE achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPXU's -30.45% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQE has outperformed SPXU with an annualized return of 14.93%, while SPXU has yielded a comparatively lower -41.50% annualized return.


QQQE

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.16%
6M
19.12%
YTD
18.72%
1Y
24.88%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
14.93%
ALL TIME*
14.57%

SPXU

1D
0.65%
1M
-6.80%
6M
-29.62%
YTD
-30.45%
1Y
-44.77%
3Y*
-42.04%
5Y*
-33.66%
10Y*
-41.50%
ALL TIME*
-42.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.56M$23.28M$25.02M
$347.12M$308.29M$360.15M

QQQE vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
18.72%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
-30.45%-41.73%-43.31%-46.02%36.05%-57.94%-70.39%-56.27%3.97%-44.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQE and SPXU is -0.87, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2012

-0.88

The correlation between QQQE and SPXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQE vs. SPXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQE
SPXU

Technology

44.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%

-

Industrials

10.8%

-

Communication Services

9.6%

-

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.0%

-

Utilities

3.9%

-

Energy

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Financial Services

1.0%
72.4%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

QQQE
44.3%
SPXU

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQE
10.9%
SPXU

-

Industrials

QQQE
10.8%
SPXU

-

Communication Services

QQQE
9.6%
SPXU

-

Healthcare

QQQE
8.8%
SPXU

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQE
8.0%
SPXU

-

Utilities

QQQE
3.9%
SPXU

-

Energy

QQQE
1.8%
SPXU

-

Basic Materials

QQQE
1.0%
SPXU

-

Financial Services

QQQE
1.0%
SPXU
72.4%

Real Estate

QQQE
0.7%
SPXU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQE vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXU
SPXU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXU Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQE vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQESPXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.80

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

-1.00

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

-1.81

+10.28

QQQE vs. SPXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the SPXU Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQE and SPXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQE vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQE drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, smaller than the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQE and SPXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQESPXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-99.99%

+67.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-45.07%

+35.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-85.17%

+63.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-90.73%

+58.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

-99.58%

+67.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-99.99%

+98.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-93.38%

+88.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

25.44%

-22.50%

Volatility

QQQE vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) is 4.70%, while ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a volatility of 12.32%. This indicates that QQQE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQESPXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

12.32%

-7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

30.95%

-17.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

38.41%

-22.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

50.77%

-30.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

53.45%

-32.67%

QQQE vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQE vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison

QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SPXU's 7.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.56%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
7.46%7.02%9.53%7.06%0.39%0.00%0.70%2.14%1.41%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQE and SPXU have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXU has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to QQQE (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQE dropped -32.14% vs SPXU's -99.99%.

On 10-year performance, QQQE leads with 14.93% vs -41.50% for SPXU. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 14.93% return vs -41.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.

SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 0.56% for QQQE.

QQQE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPXU is S&P 500. QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QQQE and 0.90% for SPXU.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQE and SPXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer