PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.76% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 12.56% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 21.95%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively lower 19.64% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.36%
YTD
17.76%
6M
20.64%
1Y
37.22%
3Y*
25.96%
5Y*
16.79%
10Y*
21.95%

ONEQ

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
12.56%
6M
15.26%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
19.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.76%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
12.56%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and ONEQ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.96

The correlation between QQQ and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
ONEQ

Technology

58.7%
54.3%

Communication Services

14.3%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.4%

Healthcare

3.7%
4.7%

Industrials

2.6%
2.9%

Utilities

1.2%
0.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
0.9%

Energy

0.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.6%

Technology

QQQ
58.7%
ONEQ
54.3%

Communication Services

QQQ
14.3%
ONEQ
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
11.4%
ONEQ
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
6.4%
ONEQ
4.4%

Healthcare

QQQ
3.7%
ONEQ
4.7%

Industrials

QQQ
2.6%
ONEQ
2.9%

Utilities

QQQ
1.2%
ONEQ
0.8%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.0%
ONEQ
0.9%

Energy

QQQ
0.5%
ONEQ
0.5%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
ONEQ
2.9%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
ONEQ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQONEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.75

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

10.53

+1.11

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-55.09%

-27.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-12.64%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-24.09%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-35.23%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-35.23%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-3.92%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.74%

-7.95%

-24.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

3.30%

-0.09%

Volatility

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) at 7.13%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

7.13%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

13.51%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

17.15%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

22.31%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

21.80%

+0.61%

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQ vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than ONEQ's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.69%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QQQ and ONEQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to ONEQ (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.95% vs 19.64% for ONEQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.95% return vs 19.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.21% for ONEQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer