QQH vs. SMCI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index, while SMCI (Super Micro Computer, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QQH returned 12.07%/yr vs 56.61%/yr for SMCI. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QQH vs. SMCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than SMCI's 13.84% return.

QQH

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 6.74%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 28.70%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: 12.07%
• 10Y*: —

SMCI

• 1D: -6.03%
• 1M: -6.35%
• YTD: 13.84%
• 6M: 8.32%
• 1Y: -18.51%
• 3Y*: 15.53%
• 5Y*: 56.61%
• 10Y*: 29.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQH vs. SMCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	6.74%	15.66%	33.64%	48.05%	-39.60%	37.52%	41.71%	15.09%
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.	13.84%	-3.97%	7.23%	246.24%	86.80%	38.82%	31.81%	26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QQH and SMCI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019	0.47

The correlation between QQH and SMCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQH vs. SMCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQH

QQH Risk / Return Rank: 35
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 34

SMCI

SMCI Risk / Return Rank: 36
SMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQH vs. SMCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQH	SMCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-0.21	+1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	0.30	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.04	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	-0.28	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	-0.46	+5.19

QQH vs. SMCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the SMCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and SMCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQH vs. SMCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum SMCI drawdown of -84.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and SMCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQH	SMCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.87%	-84.84%	+42.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.18%	-66.18%	+50.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.84%	-84.84%	+60.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.87%	-84.84%	+42.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.53%	-71.95%	+64.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-32.03%	+19.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.08%	40.05%	-33.97%

Volatility

QQH vs. SMCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is 11.82%, while Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) has a volatility of 47.45%. This indicates that QQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQH	SMCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.82%	47.45%	-35.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.82%	78.43%	-60.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.13%	87.43%	-64.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.02%	87.07%	-65.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.00%	71.48%	-46.48%

Dividends

QQH vs. SMCI - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while SMCI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	0.20%	0.21%	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQH and SMCI in my portfolio?

QQH and SMCI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQH or SMCI?

SMCI has higher volatility (47.45%) compared to QQH (11.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs SMCI's -84.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.