PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQEW vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQEW vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, QQEW has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.66%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.


QQEW

1D
-0.76%
1M
15.53%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.66%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
14.66%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQEW vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
13.03%14.22%7.00%33.31%-24.59%17.75%37.30%35.87%-5.30%26.04%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and SCHD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between QQEW and SCHD has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQEW vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQEW
SCHD

Technology

55.9%
16.4%

Healthcare

14.7%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
6.3%

Communication Services

10.3%
6.3%

Industrials

3.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
19.2%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Energy

-

16.2%

Financial Services

-

9.3%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

QQEW
55.9%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

QQEW
14.7%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QQEW
12.2%
SCHD
6.3%

Communication Services

QQEW
10.3%
SCHD
6.3%

Industrials

QQEW
3.3%
SCHD
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

QQEW
2.0%
SCHD
19.2%

Real Estate

QQEW
1.6%
SCHD

-

Basic Materials

QQEW

-

SCHD
1.2%

Energy

QQEW

-

SCHD
16.2%

Financial Services

QQEW

-

SCHD
9.3%

Utilities

QQEW

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQEW vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQEW
QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQEW vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQEWSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

2.57

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

3.98

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

6.17

-4.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.65

15.20

-10.55

QQEW vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQEWSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.57

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.77

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.86

-0.32

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQEWSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-33.37%

-24.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-4.61%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-16.13%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-16.85%

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

-33.37%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.40%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-3.32%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

1.87%

+3.26%

Volatility

QQEW vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that QQEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQEWSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

2.92%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.83%

7.66%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

10.96%

+5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

14.38%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

16.72%

+4.15%

QQEW vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQEW vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
0.28%0.41%0.57%0.70%0.66%0.24%0.34%0.48%0.56%0.48%0.73%0.61%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQEW and SCHD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQEW has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, QQEW leads with 14.66% vs 12.77% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQEW has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQEW.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.28% for QQEW.

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQEW and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer