QQCL.TO vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
QQCL.TO and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQCL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 10, 2023. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QQCL.TO or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between QQCL.TO and SCHG is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QQCL.TO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QQCL.TO:
2.13
SCHG:
1.64
QQCL.TO:
2.89
SCHG:
2.19
QQCL.TO:
1.38
SCHG:
1.30
QQCL.TO:
2.98
SCHG:
2.37
QQCL.TO:
12.34
SCHG:
8.98
QQCL.TO:
3.03%
SCHG:
3.27%
QQCL.TO:
17.56%
SCHG:
17.91%
QQCL.TO:
-12.54%
SCHG:
-34.59%
QQCL.TO:
-0.76%
SCHG:
-1.27%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCL.TO achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.09% return.
QQCL.TO
3.90%
0.95%
23.09%
37.74%
N/A
N/A
SCHG
3.09%
0.91%
13.95%
31.06%
18.74%
16.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQCL.TO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQCL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QQCL.TO vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QQCL.TO
SCHG
QQCL.TO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QQCL.TO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 11.73% | 11.87% | 3.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
QQCL.TO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.54%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCL.TO and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QQCL.TO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) is 4.33%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that QQCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.