QQC.TO vs. TMFE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while TMFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQC.TO returned 29.99%/yr vs 20.22%/yr for TMFE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQC.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TMFE.

Performance

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQC.TO is traded in CAD, while TMFE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TMFE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC.TO achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than TMFE's 2.78% return.

QQC.TO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 12.93%
• YTD: 22.65%
• 6M: 19.07%
• 1Y: 43.34%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 21.56%
• 10Y*: —

TMFE

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 8.91%
• 3Y*: 20.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	22.65%	15.38%	35.73%	51.73%	-28.07%
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF	2.78%	6.00%	38.94%	38.01%	-20.56%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC.TO and TMFE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022	0.83

The correlation between QQC.TO and TMFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQC.TO	TMFE
Technology	53.8%	30.0%
Communication Services	15.8%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	18.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	10.8%
Healthcare	4.2%	9.3%
Industrials	2.8%	4.5%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.9%
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	9.4%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQC.TO vs. TMFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

TMFE

TMFE Risk / Return Rank: 19
TMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
TMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
TMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQC.TO	TMFE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	0.74	+2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	1.11	+2.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.13	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	0.75	+2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	2.27	+9.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the TMFE Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC.TO and TMFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQC.TO	TMFE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	0.74	+2.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.69	+0.33

Drawdowns

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, which is greater than TMFE's maximum drawdown of -27.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC.TO and TMFE.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC.TO	TMFE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.81%	-27.54%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.14%	-11.91%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	-18.72%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.26%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-7.45%	-0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.93%	-0.11%

Volatility

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) at 2.71%. This indicates that QQC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQC.TO	TMFE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	2.71%	+1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	9.15%	+2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	12.08%	+3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.85%	17.71%	+3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.82%	17.71%	+3.11%

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFE's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQC.TO vs. TMFE - Dividend Comparison

QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, which matches TMFE's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.31%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF	0.31%	0.32%	0.44%	0.45%	0.40%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC.TO and TMFE in my portfolio?

QQC.TO and TMFE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQC.TO or TMFE?

On fees, QQC.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQC.TO or TMFE?

QQC.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFE.

What is the main difference between QQC.TO and TMFE?

QQC.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TMFE is Large Cap Blend Equities. QQC.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while TMFE tracks Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and RBB Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC.TO and 0.50% for TMFE.