PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQC.TO vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQC.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC.TO achieves a 22.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 20.52% return.


QQC.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
10.83%
YTD
22.09%
6M
18.58%
1Y
42.69%
3Y*
29.70%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
4.22%
YTD
20.52%
6M
18.31%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
22.09%15.38%35.73%51.73%-28.07%25.01%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
21.46%-0.44%21.25%2.24%3.64%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC.TO and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between QQC.TO and SCHD has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQC.TO
SCHD

Technology

53.8%
16.4%

Communication Services

15.8%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
19.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
18.8%

Industrials

2.8%
7.5%

Utilities

1.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.2%

Energy

0.6%
16.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
9.3%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQC.TO
53.8%
SCHD
16.4%

Communication Services

QQC.TO
15.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QQC.TO
12.3%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

QQC.TO
7.7%
SCHD
19.2%

Healthcare

QQC.TO
4.2%
SCHD
18.8%

Industrials

QQC.TO
2.8%
SCHD
7.5%

Utilities

QQC.TO
1.4%
SCHD
0.0%

Basic Materials

QQC.TO
1.1%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

QQC.TO
0.6%
SCHD
16.2%

Financial Services

QQC.TO
0.2%
SCHD
9.3%

Real Estate

QQC.TO
0.1%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQC.TO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC.TO
QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQC.TOSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.49

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

7.00

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

20.23

-9.02

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC.TO and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQC.TOSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.70

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.91

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

1.13

-0.11

Drawdowns

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC.TO and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQC.TOSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.81%

-26.93%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-4.30%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

-15.30%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.81%

-15.30%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.82%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-2.86%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

1.48%

+2.34%

Volatility

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.96%. This indicates that QQC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQC.TOSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

2.96%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

8.30%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

11.16%

+4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

12.65%

+8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

15.18%

+5.63%

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.32%0.39%0.45%0.54%0.91%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQC.TO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC.TO.

QQC.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. QQC.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC.TO and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQC.TO and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer