QQC.TO vs. SCHD
QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQC.TO returned 21.44%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQC.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQC.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQC.TO achieves a 22.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 20.52% return.
QQC.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 22.09%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- 42.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 29.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 22.09% | 15.38% | 35.73% | 51.73% | -28.07% | 25.01% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 21.46% | -0.44% | 21.25% | 2.24% | 3.64% | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQC.TO and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQC.TO and SCHD has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQC.TO
SCHD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQC.TO
SCHD
Communication Services
QQC.TO
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
QQC.TO
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
QQC.TO
SCHD
Healthcare
QQC.TO
SCHD
Industrials
QQC.TO
SCHD
Utilities
QQC.TO
SCHD
Basic Materials
QQC.TO
SCHD
Energy
QQC.TO
SCHD
Financial Services
QQC.TO
SCHD
Real Estate
QQC.TO
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQC.TO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
QQC.TO
SCHD
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.49 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 7.00 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 20.23 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.70 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.91 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.13 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQC.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC.TO and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.81% | -26.93% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -4.30% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.59% | -15.30% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.81% | -15.30% | -16.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.82% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -2.86% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 1.48% | +2.34% |
Volatility
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.96%. This indicates that QQC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQC.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 2.96% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 8.30% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.16% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 12.65% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 15.18% | +5.63% |
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQC.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.32% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQC.TO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC.TO.
QQC.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. QQC.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC.TO and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for QQC.TO and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer