PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQC-F.TO is traded in CAD, while AMZN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMZN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, QQC-F.TO has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 20.30%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 22.43% annualized return.


QQC-F.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
10.71%
YTD
19.79%
6M
17.83%
1Y
38.43%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
20.30%

AMZN

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
12.09%
6M
9.52%
1Y
25.80%
3Y*
28.64%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
22.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
19.79%18.41%24.19%52.81%-33.42%27.15%45.04%37.63%-2.23%31.94%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
9.70%0.38%56.80%76.90%-46.02%1.45%73.28%16.98%39.32%46.03%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and AMZN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.59

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQC-F.TOAMZNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.17

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

1.07

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

2.60

+8.31

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQC-F.TOAMZNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

0.87

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.38

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.71

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.90

+0.02

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -52.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and AMZN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQC-F.TOAMZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-52.40%

+16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-24.20%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

-33.19%

+10.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-52.40%

+16.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

-52.40%

+16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-5.99%

+5.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-11.00%

+5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

9.96%

-6.43%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) is 4.49%, while Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQC-F.TOAMZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

6.70%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

19.96%

-7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

29.92%

-14.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

34.39%

-11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

31.53%

-8.99%

Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQC-F.TO nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.00%0.09%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQC-F.TO and AMZN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and AMZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer