QLTY vs. VTV

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QLTY having a 1.47% return and VTV slightly lower at 1.42%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

QLTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VTV's 2.30% yield.

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and VTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 4.64%. This indicates that QLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.