PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLTY vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLTY vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLTY vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
-5.77%21.26%21.02%5.68%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
3.30%15.27%15.95%7.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTY achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 3.30% return.


QLTY

1D
2.76%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
-5.77%
6M
0.36%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTV

1D
1.64%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
3.30%
6M
6.34%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLTY vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLTY vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTY
QLTY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTY vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLTYVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

1.08

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.56

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.53

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

6.93

-1.11

QLTY vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLTYVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.08

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.49

+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between QLTY and VTV is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QLTY vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than VTV's 2.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
0.81%0.73%0.79%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
2.02%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Drawdowns

QLTY vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and VTV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLTYVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.00%

-59.27%

+42.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-11.32%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-4.81%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-7.92%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.50%

+0.54%

Volatility

QLTY vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.78%. This indicates that QLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLTYVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

3.78%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

7.72%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

14.93%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

13.88%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

16.67%

-1.86%