QLTY vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QLTY (GMO U.S. Quality ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLTY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QLTY returned 23.44% vs 27.19% for VTV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLTY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

QLTY vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTY achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.47% return.

QLTY

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 13.93%
• 1Y: 27.19%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTY vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	5.56%	21.26%	21.02%	5.25%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	14.47%	15.27%	15.95%	7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QLTY and VTV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2023	0.72

The correlation between QLTY and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLTY vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLTY	VTV
Technology	40.1%	16.4%
Healthcare	22.1%	14.1%
Communication Services	11.7%	3.1%
Financial Services	7.8%	21.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	8.9%
Industrials	4.3%	13.9%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Energy	-	7.4%
Real Estate	-	2.7%
Utilities	-	4.8%

Return for Risk

QLTY vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTY

QLTY Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 51

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 84
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTY vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLTY	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.63	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.75	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.47	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	4.30	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	16.20	-8.05

QLTY vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QLTY vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLTY	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.00%	-59.27%	+42.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-6.35%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.89%	-0.56%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-7.85%	+5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	1.68%	+1.20%

Volatility

QLTY vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.41%. This indicates that QLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLTY	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	3.41%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	7.85%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	10.39%	+2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.68%	13.88%	+0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	16.65%	-1.97%

QLTY vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLTY vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than VTV's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	0.72%	0.73%	0.79%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.83%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLTY and VTV in my portfolio?

QLTY and VTV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLTY or VTV?

QLTY has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to VTV (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLTY dropped -17.00% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, QLTY or VTV?

On 1-year performance, VTV leads with 27.19% vs 23.44% for QLTY. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLTY or VTV?

Over the 1-year period, VTV has performed better with a 27.19% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLTY or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QLTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLTY or VTV?

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.72% for QLTY.

What is the main difference between QLTY and VTV?

QLTY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. QLTY tracks S&P 500, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QLTY and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.