PortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. FNGO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and FNGO is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

QLD vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

QLD:

25.60%

FNGO:

39.30%

Max Drawdown

QLD:

-1.84%

FNGO:

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

QLD:

-0.17%

FNGO:

-2.25%

Returns By Period


QLD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLD vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QLD and FNGO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QLD vs. FNGO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QLD is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QLD is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QLD is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QLD is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QLD is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QLD is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGO is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGO is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGO is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGO is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QLD vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

QLD vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QLD vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -1.84%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -2.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and FNGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QLD vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...