PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIS vs. FLSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QIS vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QIS vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
-19.78%-38.02%0.19%1.96%
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
1.97%15.56%11.75%0.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -19.78% return, which is significantly lower than FLSP's 1.97% return.


QIS

1D
-1.78%
1M
-16.72%
YTD
-19.78%
6M
-38.94%
1Y
-48.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLSP

1D
0.88%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
1.97%
6M
6.72%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QIS vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QIS vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIS
QIS Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIS vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QISFLSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.20

1.17

-2.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.79

1.65

-3.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.23

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

2.22

-3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.65

10.08

-11.72

QIS vs. FLSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the FLSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIS and FLSP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QISFLSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.20

1.17

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.82

0.32

-1.14

Correlation

The correlation between QIS and FLSP is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QIS vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison

QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than FLSP's 2.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
1.68%3.37%1.07%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.60%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%

Drawdowns

QIS vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -52.97%, which is greater than FLSP's maximum drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and FLSP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QISFLSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.97%

-22.75%

-30.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.63%

-6.24%

-46.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.97%

-1.26%

-51.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-6.42%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.24%

1.47%

+27.77%

Volatility

QIS vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) at 3.67%. This indicates that QIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QISFLSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.29%

3.67%

+7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.34%

7.17%

+18.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.82%

12.35%

+28.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.91%

13.42%

+13.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.91%

13.67%

+13.24%