PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRW vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRW vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return.


QGRW

1D
0.00%
1M
8.02%
YTD
15.43%
6M
14.33%
1Y
35.04%
3Y*
29.12%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.68%
1M
2.84%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.65%
1Y
28.76%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRW vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
15.43%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.30%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.82%4.34%11.66%4.54%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRW and SCHD is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between QGRW and SCHD has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QGRW vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QGRW
SCHD

Technology

52.1%
16.4%

Communication Services

17.8%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
6.3%

Industrials

8.0%
7.5%

Healthcare

4.3%
18.8%

Financial Services

4.1%
9.3%

Energy

0.6%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
19.2%

Utilities

0.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

QGRW
52.1%
SCHD
16.4%

Communication Services

QGRW
17.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QGRW
12.4%
SCHD
6.3%

Industrials

QGRW
8.0%
SCHD
7.5%

Healthcare

QGRW
4.3%
SCHD
18.8%

Financial Services

QGRW
4.1%
SCHD
9.3%

Energy

QGRW
0.6%
SCHD
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

QGRW
0.5%
SCHD
19.2%

Utilities

QGRW
0.4%
SCHD
0.0%

Basic Materials

QGRW

-

SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

QGRW

-

SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRW vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRW vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QGRWSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

6.26

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

15.38

-6.45

QGRW vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRW and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QGRWSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.64

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.86

+0.79

Drawdowns

QGRW vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRWSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-33.37%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-4.61%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-16.13%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.73%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-3.32%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

1.87%

+2.07%

Volatility

QGRW vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.69%. This indicates that QGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRWSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

2.69%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

7.65%

+6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

10.95%

+6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

14.38%

+6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

16.71%

+4.36%

QGRW vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRW vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.07%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


QGRW and SCHD have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRW has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to SCHD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.12% vs 15.59% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.

QGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRW and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer