QGRO vs. PRWAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and PRWAX (T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 12.22%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for PRWAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRWAX.

Performance

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than PRWAX's 1.11% return.

QGRO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 10.81%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: —

PRWAX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 18.74%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF	2.19%	15.18%	31.42%	32.42%	-24.54%	24.57%	37.99%	35.09%	-16.85%
PRWAX T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund	1.11%	16.37%	25.24%	29.02%	-21.37%	20.63%	44.73%	35.08%	-13.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRO and PRWAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018	0.90

The correlation between QGRO and PRWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QGRO vs. PRWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRO

QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 20
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 22

PRWAX

PRWAX Risk / Return Rank: 15
PRWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PRWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
PRWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
PRWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PRWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QGRO	PRWAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	1.17	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	1.69	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.21	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	1.10	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.69	3.85	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the PRWAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRO and PRWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QGRO	PRWAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	1.17	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.60	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.60	+0.07

Drawdowns

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum PRWAX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and PRWAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QGRO	PRWAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.56%	-55.06%	+22.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-14.09%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.82%	-19.06%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.86%	-29.38%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.87%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-9.90%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	4.00%	+0.03%

Volatility

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Volatility Comparison

American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QGRO	PRWAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.52%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	10.56%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	13.27%	+2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	17.61%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.93%	18.72%	+4.21%

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWAX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

QGRO vs. PRWAX - Dividend Comparison

QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than PRWAX's 8.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRWAX T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund	8.26%	8.35%	9.22%	5.10%	3.11%	20.51%	15.44%	7.01%	12.58%	12.30%	6.19%	8.84%
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF	0.19%	0.25%	0.25%	0.41%	0.46%	0.31%	0.22%	0.38%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QGRO and PRWAX in my portfolio?

QGRO and PRWAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QGRO or PRWAX?

PRWAX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to QGRO (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs PRWAX's -55.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.