PortfoliosLab logo
QDVO vs. HCOW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and HCOW is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

QDVO vs. HCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.84%
-6.25%
QDVO
HCOW

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

QDVO:

23.12%

HCOW:

21.25%

Max Drawdown

QDVO:

-17.75%

HCOW:

-24.15%

Current Drawdown

QDVO:

-6.90%

HCOW:

-15.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a -3.54% return, which is significantly higher than HCOW's -9.66% return.


QDVO

YTD

-3.54%

1M

13.19%

6M

-1.49%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

HCOW

YTD

-9.66%

1M

11.02%

6M

-12.45%

1Y

-6.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDVO vs. HCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HCOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QDVO vs. HCOW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO

HCOW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCOW is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCOW is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCOW is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCOW is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCOW is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCOW is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QDVO vs. HCOW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

QDVO vs. HCOW - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than HCOW's 9.70% yield.


TTM20242023
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
6.29%2.78%0.00%
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
9.70%8.13%1.99%

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. HCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum HCOW drawdown of -24.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and HCOW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-6.90%
-15.79%
QDVO
HCOW

Volatility

QDVO vs. HCOW - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) at 11.27%. This indicates that QDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.17%
11.27%
QDVO
HCOW