PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. YBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTE vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -25.51% return.


QDTE

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.12%
YTD
16.06%
6M
15.73%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YBTC

1D
-2.77%
1M
-19.76%
YTD
-25.51%
6M
-28.64%
1Y
-36.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and YBTC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.45

The correlation between QDTE and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTE vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTEYBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.84

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

-0.78

+4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.60

-1.43

+17.03

QDTE vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTEYBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

-0.94

+3.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

0.13

+1.16

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and YBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTEYBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-47.09%

+24.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-47.09%

+36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-45.60%

+45.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-12.94%

+9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

25.85%

-23.33%

Volatility

QDTE vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 3.72%, while Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTEYBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

8.73%

-5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

31.30%

-20.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

39.25%

-24.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

40.82%

-22.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

40.82%

-22.40%

QDTE vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTE vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.41%, less than YBTC's 90.64% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QDTE and YBTC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YBTC has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to QDTE (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs YBTC's -47.09%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 39.17% vs -36.84% for YBTC. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 39.17% return vs -36.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 90.64%, compared with 43.41% for QDTE.

QDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.95% for YBTC.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTE and YBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer