QDTE vs. YBTC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTE returned 32.12% vs -41.97% for YBTC. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YBTC.

Performance

QDTE vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -29.71% return.

QDTE

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: 13.50%
• 6M: 12.07%
• 1Y: 32.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YBTC

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -20.53%
• YTD: -29.71%
• 6M: -29.13%
• 1Y: -41.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	13.50%	19.32%	17.13%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-29.71%	-4.23%	29.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and YBTC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.46

The correlation between QDTE and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QDTE vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 69
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDTE	YBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	-1.06	+3.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	-1.51	+4.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.81	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	-0.86	+4.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	-1.50	+13.65

QDTE vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -48.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and YBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTE	YBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.86%	-48.82%	+25.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.20%	-48.82%	+38.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.79%	-48.67%	+45.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-13.69%	+10.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	28.03%	-25.38%

Volatility

QDTE vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 8.47%, while Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDTE	YBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.47%	12.75%	-4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	32.01%	-18.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	39.93%	-23.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.97%	40.92%	-21.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	40.92%	-21.95%

QDTE vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDTE vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.00%, less than YBTC's 95.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	45.00%	49.49%	32.09%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	95.12%	76.04%	44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTE and YBTC in my portfolio?

QDTE and YBTC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDTE or YBTC?

YBTC has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to QDTE (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs YBTC's -48.82%.

Which ETF is better, QDTE or YBTC?

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 32.12% vs -41.97% for YBTC. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDTE or YBTC?

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 32.12% return vs -41.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDTE or YBTC?

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDTE or YBTC?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 95.12%, compared with 45.00% for QDTE.

What is the main difference between QDTE and YBTC?

QDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.95% for YBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.